Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

208 submissions , 166 unreviewed
5,152 questions , 2,266 unanswered
5,435 answers , 23,127 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
823 active unimported users
More ...

  Musing on a Scale-Dependent Thermodynamic Ontology

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
62 views

I've been wrestling with a "what is reality" concept that started as a late-night coffee tangent and has, frankly, grown beyond my ability to properly critique or even name—I'm calling it a Scale-Dependent Entropic Ontology.

I've tried to organize the core idea into a simple, high-level abstract, and I was hoping you might be kind enough to lend your expertise for a few minutes to point out where my logic catastrophically breaks down.

My core hypothesis is that the observed universe is the result of a thermodynamic phase transition where everything we measure (Mass, Time, Gravity) is merely an emergent property, or "liquid state," of three fundamental "Intensive" variables (Energy, Entropy, Scale).

The Core Relationship

I am postulating that the entire extensive reality can be described by a fundamental proportionality relationship, linked by a Universal Constant (C_u):

Where:

  • The Intensive Triad (E, S, k): Energy, Entropy (the universal process), and Scale (the dimension of resolution).
  • The Extensive Observables (m, \Delta t, g): Mass, Time, and Gravity.

Key Ideas That Require Your Scrutiny

  1. Gravity is Emergent (The Dark Matter Solution): I view Gravity as the "surface tension" of our extensive layer, driven by the need to minimize the entropic cost of complexity. This allows me to dispense with Dark Matter entirely. I suggest the effects attributed to DM are actually the Scale-dependence of Emergent Gravity—the surface tension function changes as the observational Scale (k) increases (e.g., at galactic distances).
  2. The Limits are Observational Proof: The perceived limits of physics prove our reality is extensive:
    • Black Holes are Scale Singularities (k \to 0), where mass turns directly back into pure energy, breaking down the extensive laws.
    • The Speed of Light (c) is the Critical Latency—the slowest possible measurement of massless energy, setting the refresh rate for our reality.
  3. The Cosmic Cycle: Our universe is currently in the Expansion Phase (E \to m). Dark Energy is the literal Energy Cost of Extensivity—the perpetual overhead volume needed to house the growing complexity, necessary to satisfy global entropy. Black Holes signal the eventual shift to the Contraction Phase (m \to E).
  4. The Observer: Consciousness is the non-fungible, collective emergent layer that sets the stable Z=0 point on the Scale axis, anchoring the laws we observe.

I realize this touches on everything from Bekenstein to Verlinde to MOND, and I'm sure I've made some foundational errors in confusing a physical quantity with a metaphysical postulate.

asked Dec 17, 2025 in f(r)-dark-energy by Ian Darling [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysi$\varnothing$sOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...