Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,786 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  What exactly is Göedel reffering to when he says "world lines of matter" in his 1949 article about his solution to Einstein Field Equations?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
234 views

Im writing my college thesis about Gödel's article "A New Type of Cosmological Solutions of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravitation".

As far as I had undestand, there are important geometric object such as x^0-lines (spatial stationary particle world lines), closed timelike curves (or Gödel's helix as I like to call it) and three-spaces, but I cant figure out what is Kurt exactly reffering to when he writes "world lines of matter". As he claims in this article, he uses this object to talk about some of properties of his solution, properties 2 and 6 to be precise, but when he writes propertie 8 and its proof is critical to understand, both formally and heuristically, the very nature of this object.

Pardon me if I am being too emphatical, maybe my english is not as good to write in a more relaxed and ellegant manner.

Thanks for your help.

asked Sep 14 in Theoretical Physics by Felipe Reyna [ no revision ]

World line of matter refers to the trajectory of physical objects in spacetime. The Gödel's theory of the rotating universe theorizes that the WLM follow paths that could potentially go back in time. Another interesting consequence of this theory is here

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

From section 1, property (6), footnote 4 "world lines of matter" means "world lines of matter occurring as such in the solution". This at least hints that, for example, world lines of observers in spacecraft with propulsion, or wordlines of particles under applied forces are not considered "world lines of matter".

In section 3, immediately after the equation $w^j=\ldots$ it is stated that "in our case" $v_i=u_i$. In section 2, $u$ has been introduced as the unit vector "in the direction of the $x_0$-lines". This fits with the 1st paragraph of section 3, where the non-existence of a one-parametric system of three-spaces orthogonal on the $x_0$-lines is mentioned, and then related to the more general case of three-spaces everywhere orthogonal to a vector field $v$.

The 1st paragraph of section 3 relates to the 1st paragraph of section 1 "... owing to the fact that there exists a one-parametric system of three-spaces everywhere orthogonal on the world-lines of matter". 

That is, the "world lines of matter" are the $x_0$-lines.

This is in keeping with property (8) as stated in section 1, where the three-spaces considered are such that they intersect each "world line of matter" in one point, if related to the proof of property (8), where $U$ is such a three-space that has to have a "point in common with each $x_0$-line situated on $S_0$".

answered Sep 14 by Flamma (110 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$low
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...