# Does a particle and antiparticle have the same velocity and acceleration in an electric field?

+ 0 like - 2 dislike
926 views

As I understand it, according to the CPT theorem an antiparticle can be thought of as having either the opposite charge (C) or the opposite spacetime parity (PT). For example in Feynman diagrams a positron going forwards in spacetime is equivalent to an electron going backwards in spacetime.

Let us assume that we have a particle of mass $m$ and charge $q$ moving in the x-direction under the influence of an electric field $\vec{E}$ directed along the x-axis.

The velocity $\vec{v}=d\vec{x}/dt$ and acceleration $\vec{a}=d^2\vec{x}/dt^2$ of the particle are given by
\begin{eqnarray}
\frac{d\vec{x}}{dt} &=& \frac{\vec{p}}{m},\tag{1}\\
\frac{d^2\vec{x}}{dt^2} &=& \frac{q\vec{E}}{m}.\tag{2}
\end{eqnarray}

Now consider the particle's antiparticle. Instead of assuming it has the opposite charge we can assume that it has the opposite spacetime parity. This means that it has negative momentum and negative mass implying that it is traveling backwards in both space and time.

When we apply the following transformations to Eqn.$(1)$ and Eqn.$(2)$ they remain the same:
\begin{eqnarray}
\vec{p} &\rightarrow& -\vec{p},\\
m &\rightarrow& -m,\\
d\vec{x} &\rightarrow& -d\vec{x},\\
dt &\rightarrow& -dt.
\end{eqnarray}

Thus the antiparticle has the same velocity $\vec{v}$ and acceleration $\vec{a}$ as the particle.

Is this correct?

edited Aug 20, 2022

m -->-m ? Particles and antiparticles have the same mass .

Dirac considered that antiparticles could have a negative energy. This would explain why an electron annihilates with a positron giving out two photons. In a sense the electron falls into the negative energy well which is the positron.

A hole in the negative energy spectrum (positron) and a patch (electron) are figurative notions, not real ones, because all particles and antiparticles have positive energies. The resulting photons have positive energies!

Perhaps I should say that antiparticles can be considered to have either the opposite charge or negative rest-mass. Antiphotons have zero charge and zero rest-mass so that they are identical to photons.

Stick to the opposite charge - this is proven to be the right description.

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOverflo$\varnothing$Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). Please complete the anti-spam verification