• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

203 submissions , 161 unreviewed
5,006 questions , 2,162 unanswered
5,341 answers , 22,655 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
815 active unimported users
More ...

  Best computational speed for dollar.

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

I'm running some simulations from home, but I need more speed.  I was wondering how  to best spend my money.   I'm using Open source Fortran on a Mac which is about six years old.  If I buy the Intel Fortran compiler for about $600, that might increase my speed by a factor of 2 or more.  Alternatively, I could invest in a new computer.  If I buy a PC then I might get more computational bang for my buck.  We have occasional brief power outages here in Oregon, so I was thinking a laptop has a battery and might get me through many of these outages, but do laptops provide as much computational speed per dollar spent.  Does anyone have advise?

asked Feb 18, 2021 in Computational Physics by christophe (0 points) [ revision history ] 1 flag
reshown Mar 2, 2021 by Arnold Neumaier

Off-topic (belongs to computer science)

 Users with 500+ reputation may vote here to close.

1 Answer

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

The answer will probably depend on the nature of your simulations. For example, if you simulations can be easily parallelized then the biggest speedup will probably come from running on many cores simultaneously. Note that whether one compiler is faster than another depends on the specific problem as well. See https://benchmarksgame-team.pages.debian.net/benchmarksgame/fastest/ifc-gfortran.html

answered Feb 25, 2021 by superbee [ no revision ]

@superbee  Thanks for the link to the bench mark  page. I'm astonished that the intel compiler is only clearly superior to the gfortran open source on one category, and slightly better on two categories.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights