Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,352 answers , 22,786 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Instanton effects on condensates: (pseudo)scalars, (pseudo)vectors, tensor

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
1462 views

I have heard that the instanton effect in quark matter causes the di-quark condensate to be Lorentz scalar. As opposed to the Lorentz scalar, there are possibilities that the condensates are Lorentz pseudoscalars, Lorentz vectors, Lorentz pseudovectors, or Lorentz tensors. It could also possibly break the Lorentz symmetry.

So what is the physical intuition or math reasoning behind that instanton effect favor Lorentz scalar, but does not favor (pseudoscalars) that breaks parity $P$? How about other cases?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
asked Sep 25, 2017 in Theoretical Physics by annie marie heart (1,205 points) [ no revision ]
What do you understand by the "di-quark condensate"?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user Name YYY
It could be $<qq>, <\bar{q}q>$ and there are issues of their quantum numbers, such as spin $s$, angular momentum $L$, charge, color, parity, Lorentz [(pseudo)scalars, (pseudo)vectors, tensor], etc.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
By di-quark condensate, usually people mean $<qq>$. People may call $<q¯q>$ as anti-quark-quark condensate.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
You, of course, don't mean the realistic QCD quark condensate causing the SSB in the QCD, right?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user Name YYY
$ <q¯q> \neq 0$ in chiral symmetry breaking. $<qq> \neq 0$ in superconducting phase. I am talking about the superconducting phase.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
But how this "di-quark condensate" can be the scalar? It is non-invariant by the construction.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user Name YYY
Do you agree that meson is $q¯q$ pair but it can be a pseudo-scalar? In fact, it can be (Pseudo)-scalar/vector meson and Tensor meson. If so what leaves the constraints for writing $qq$, and for writing $q¯q$?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
My understanding is that you can insert $\gamma^5$ and $\gamma^\mu$ into the condensate (what it means implicitly in the condensate shorthand).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart
The condensate itself has nothing to do with the vector, tensor and scalar mesons.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user Name YYY
No, that was not what I mean. The instanton may favor certain channels such that only certein (pseudo)scalars, (pseudo)vectors, tensor tend to condense. I am asking which and what instanton causes this effect, what do they favor others.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2020-10-29 11:44 (UTC), posted by SE-user annie marie heart

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$w
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...