Extending the Sudden Approximation to $2$nd quantised systems?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
527 views

Background
---

So basically there is a dictionary/correspondence between first and second quantised quantum mechanical theories. When I suddenly turn on a potential in potential in first quantised theories I can use the sudden approximation and find the probability of the final state. I can use the dictionary to find a result in the second quantised theory as well. My question is what happens when the potential turned on is such that the particle number is not conserved? Is there a way to extend the approximation?

Calculations
---

Let us restrict our discussion to bosons and adopt the convention First Quantised $\leftrightarrow$ Second Quantised Theory (We are following these Ashok Sen's [Quantum Field Theory I][1] of HRI institute also on my [google drive][2]). Consider a single particle system's hamiltonian $\hat h$ and energy operator $\hat E$:

$$\hat h \psi = \hat E \psi$$

with energy eigenstates $u_i$ and eigenvalues $e_n$

$$\hat h u_n = e_n u_n$$

Now moving to an assembly of quantum mechanical Hamiltonians (many body system)  $\sum_i h_i$ with an interacting potential $\hat v_{ik}$ corresponds to a second quantised version (Page 16):

$$\hat H_N = \sum_{i=1}^N \hat h_i + \frac{1}{2}\sum_{\substack i\neq j \\ i,j=1 }^N \hat v_{i,j} \leftrightarrow \sum_{n=1}^\infty e_n a_n^\dagger a_n + \frac{1}{2} \sum_{m,n,p,q=1}^\infty \Big(\int \int d^3 r_1 d^3 r_2 u_{m}(\vec r_1)^* u_{n}(\vec r_2)^* \hat v_{12} u_{m}(\vec r_1) u_{p}(\vec r_2) \Big) a^\dagger_m a^\dagger_n a_p a_q$$

where $e_n$ i the $n$th energy eigevalue,  $u_i$ are the one-particle eigenstates and $a_i^\dagger$ is the creation operator of the $i$'th particle and they obey the energy eigenvalue system $h_i u_n = e_n u_n$. The symmetric wave function for $H_N$ corresponds as a second quantised version (Page 6):

$$u_{n_1,n_2,\dots n_N} \equiv \frac{1}{\sqrt{N!}} \sum_{\text{Permutations of r_1,\dots,r_N}}u_{n_1} (\vec r_1) \dots u_{n_N} (\vec r_N) \leftrightarrow (a_1^\dagger)^{n_1} (a_2^\dagger)^{n_2} \dots (a_N^\dagger)^{n_N} |0 \rangle$$

The potential corresponds for one body operator (Page 14):

$$\sum_{i=1}^N \hat B_{i} \leftrightarrow \sum_{n,p = 1}^\infty \Big( \int d^3 r_1 u_n^* (\vec r_1) B_{1} u_p (\vec r_1) \Big) a^\dagger_n a_p$$

Now, let's say I suddenly turn on the one body operator (potential) in the assembly of quantum mechanical systems. Then:

$$H'_N = \sum_{i=1}^N \hat h_i + \frac{1}{2}\sum_{\substack i\neq j \\ i,j=1 }^N \hat v_{i,j} + \sum_i^N \hat B_{i}$$

Let the new energy eigenstates be $\tilde u_n$ with the original state be $u_{n_1,n_2,\dots,n_N}$. Then the final state being in $\tilde u_{n'_1,n'_2,\dots,n'_N}$ has probability $| \int \tilde u_{n'_1,n'_2,\dots,n'_N}u^*_{n_1,n_2,\dots,n_N} d^3 r|^2$. Now using the dictionary we can find the corresponding $2$nd quantised state. This is nothing but the **sudden approximation**.

Question
---
Is there a way to extend the sudden approximation to potentials which do not conserve particle number?

Yes, there is, and it is the same.

The real problem is not in a final state being represented in terms of (quasi) particles of the new Hamiltonian, but in the degree of suddenness. If the perturbation takes a smal,, but a finite time and if the spectrum of the final Hamiltonian contains high-energy excitations, then for some high-energy excitations (hard modes) the perturbation may be not sudden and the approximation will not be good.

Thanks any reference where I can read more about the second approximation in the context of second quantised systems?

I do not have any, sorry.

@Vladimir Kalitvianski any idea of a physical system where this might be applicable?

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.