• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

185 submissions , 145 unreviewed
4,718 questions , 1,924 unanswered
5,265 answers , 22,441 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
743 active unimported users
More ...

  How Matching Junction Conditions in f(R) gravity are derived ?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

I am complete beginner in this field. I am studying this paper 'Study of Anisotropic Compact Stars in Starobinsky Model'. Here in this paper, https://arxiv.org/pdf/1412.2120.pdf , I am confused about how the author wrote the matching conditions as shown below in the image. I have gone through the references written in the paper, but I can't find the form as given in this paper ? Anyone has idea or is there any reference of how  is this derived ?

I also want some advice about researchwork. For example, I am not much proficient in f(R) gravity and theories, but I just know about procedures. I am actually working with a group and we make our metric and from previous studies we assume solutions of spherically symmetric metric and then try to match our model with available data. I want to know is this okay to proceed in this manner, or should I go through all the references given here.

I have also found this one: https://arxiv.org/pdf/0711.1150.pdf - "Junction Conditions in f(R) Theories of Gravity" Is this relevant one to here? If yes, how and if no, how ?

How much common is this for a "good" researcher that (s)he stuck with something or not able to understand, or you know, I am trapped in studying these references/prerequisites.

Also, this is my first question in this community website. If I have broken any norm then please inform me.

asked Feb 1, 2020 in Resources and References by Hardey Pandya (0 points) [ no revision ]
recategorized Feb 1, 2020 by Hardey Pandya

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights