Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Are the viscosity and the volume of a fluid related by an uncertainty relation?

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
871 views

Is there a relation of the type  $\Delta \eta \ \Delta V \geq \hbar $ ?

I have found nothing via Google Scholar on this topic. 

There might be applications for the inequality in black hole physics.

asked Jun 2, 2019 in Open problems by Frauke [ revision history ]
edited Jun 2, 2019

There are many consistency reasons to answer no. But it's too broad to answer anything :) Perhaps were you looking for Dam Thanh Son articles around Hall viscosity like, but not only, Effective field theory for fluids: Hall viscosity from a Wess-Zumino-Witten term . I'm curious to know what you would answer today.

 

Thank you - I was indeed thinking about the various publications of Son, Starinets and Kovtun.

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

The free stress-energy tensor can be defined as

$$T^{\mu\nu}_{\rm free} = \int f(x^\mu,p_\mu) p^\mu p^\nu \frac{d^3 p}{p_0 m^2}$$

where $f$ is the distribution function, and I assume massive particles of mass $m$. The interaction stress-energy tensor can then be chosen so that $T^{\mu\nu}_{\;\;;\nu}$ is equivalent to the second moment of the collisional Boltzmann equation

$${f,H_{\rm free}} = \frac{\delta f}{\delta t}\Big|_{\rm coll.}$$

Generally, this is not possible. However, it is generically possible to obtain a volume-averaged version of the second moment that offers an asymptotic description of the dynamics in terms of an averaged stress-energy tensor $\bar{T}^{\mu\nu}$. This amounts to a free stress energy tensor with additional viscosity terms that scale as the gradients of stress energy times kinematic viscosity, $\sim \nu T^{\mu\nu}_{{\rm free};\kappa}$. However, the volume averaging itself adds terms

$$\bar{T^{\mu\nu}}_{\rm free} \equiv \frac{1}{\delta V}\int_{\delta V} T^{\mu\nu}_{\rm free} d^3 x = T^{\mu\nu}_{\rm free} + \propto T^{\mu\nu}_{\rm free;\kappa} \delta V^{1/3} + \propto T^{\mu\nu}_{\rm free;\kappa\gamma} \delta V^{2/3} + ...$$

In other words, the averaging volume itself adds kinematic viscosity, or $\Delta \nu/\Delta V^{1/3} \sim C$, where $C$ is a dimensionless geometrical-type constant. By going quantum, one can assume that $\delta V^{1/3}$ needs to be about as large as the De Broglie wavelength or smaller for convergence (note I assume massive particles), and assuming an ideal-gas-type behaviour, we have $\delta V^{1/3} \sim h/ \sqrt{m k_{\rm B} T}$, so I get

$$\Delta \nu \sqrt{m k_{\rm B} T} \lesssim h$$

This is really nothing like your relation. However, it can perhaps be useful for you to see that what kind of relation you get depends on the physical context you cite.

I think you might get interesting stuff from a gradient-type expansion of a conformal quantum fluid rather than massive non-relativistic gases as considered in this answer.

answered Jun 4, 2019 by Void (1,645 points) [ revision history ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverf$\varnothing$ow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...