Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,720 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Probability of finding a particle in a two/three particle system

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
518 views

Let us consider a system of 2 identical particles, 1 and 2.

Let, ψa(1) is the amplitude of finding particle 1 at state a, and ψa(2) is the amplitude of finding particle 2 at state a.

Let N.F is an arbitrary normalization factor.

Now, if 1 and 2 are bosons, we know that, finding both 1 AND 2 at a has an amplitude

N.F * (ψa(1)ψa(2)+ψa(2)ψa(1)) = 2 * N.F * ψa(1)ψa(2)

While in case of fermions, that amplitude is

N.F * (ψa(1)ψa(2)−ψa(2)ψa(1)) = 0

[Pauli exclusion Principle]

Now,

  1. What is the amplitude that 1 OR 2 will be state a? (Here OR means inclusive OR).

    a) Is it simply ψa(1)+ψa(2) in case of fermions? If not, What is the correct equation?

    b) Is it simply ψa(1)−ψa(2) in case of bosons? If not, What is the correct equation?

  2. What would be the amplitude in case of 3 particle system? Again, we are assuming the OR case, not the AND case. Please reply

    a) for fermions, and

    b) for bosons.

Thanks in advance.

asked Apr 25, 2019 in Theoretical Physics by vampireegg (0 points) [ revision history ]
edited Apr 25, 2019 by vampireegg

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...