• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

203 submissions , 161 unreviewed
5,006 questions , 2,162 unanswered
5,341 answers , 22,655 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
815 active unimported users
More ...

  Why is the single particle field state not on the quantum harmonic oscillator spectrum?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Two kinds of waves can be present in quantum systems, which have corresponding frequencies. I will call the first "de Broglie" (quantum / probability) waves and frequencies, in simple systems they correspond to energy eigenstates. I will call the second "Maxwell" (classical / intensity) waves and frequencies, they correspond to coherent states.

There is a commonly taught correspondence between the states of a single momentum of a quantum field and the states of a simple harmonic oscillator (a second derivative plus a constant operating on either state is zero). This correspondence implies a similar solution space, in this case one which has creation and annihilation operators and coherent states.

My question concerns the energy spectrum of these solution spaces. The allowed energies of the harmonic oscillator are $ h f_M (n+\frac{1}{2} ) $ with n an integer. That is to say, the 'de Broglie' energies may be $ (n+\frac{1}{2} ) h $ times the 'Maxwell' frequency. For an individual photon, $ E = h f_{dB} $ . However, we know an individual photon is a 'de Broglie' state of the electromagnetic field. The corresponding 'Maxwell' frequency for all occupation states of the same momentum is the same as the 'de Broglie' frequency. Therefore we can also say $ E = h f_M $ . However, this is not in the oscillator spectrum $ h f_M ( n + 1/2 ) $ . I would like to know why the two systems with dynamical equations of the same form do not have the same relationship between their 'Maxwell' frequencies and 'de Broglie' energies.

Apologies for the probably nonstandard terminology. I did not find a general naming convention for the two types of waves and their associated properties.

asked May 16, 2018 in Theoretical Physics by anonymous [ no revision ]

I am not sure if I understand it correctly, but in QFT the constant 1/2 is considered as the zero-point energy and can be dropped out.

Thank you, that's been an extremely helpful lead to further research.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights