# A generalized Path integral ?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
220 views

I'm trying to rederive quantum mechanics from feynman's idea of integrating over all possible histories of quantum systems. Following this line of thought , I have found that the path integral can be considered as just matrix multiplication with Einstein's summation convention in the continuum limit. Every random walk in the discretized integral can be considered as a choice of certain values for the dummy indices. If we generalized this situation by considering arbitrary contractions with higher rank tensors instead of just matrix multiplication and passing to the continuum limit , can this lead to any new form of path integral or is it just a path integral with more integration variables ? What about considering contractions using spinors ? asked Mar 23, 2017
edited Mar 23, 2017

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Quantum mechanics bases on states in the Hilbert space; these can be seen like vectors (representable in an orthonormal basis system), where a scalar product can be defined. If one multiplies two different vectors $a_i,b_j$, where the indices $i,j$ run over the complete Hilbert space basis by the scalar product

$<a_i,b_j> = c_{ij}$

one obtains a matrix $c_{ij}$. To obtain higher rank tensors you have to define first a new space of states, e.g. the states of the $L^p$ space with $p>2$. Moreover you have to define e.g. a generalized scalar product

$<a_i,b_j,c_k,...> = d_{ijk ...}$

with orthogonality conditions. Suppose you can generalize the spectral theorem as follows:

$H = \sum_{\lambda \in \Gamma} H_{\gamma} e_\gamma$

where $H$ is an operator, $H_\lambda$ the eigenvalues of it, $\Gamma$ the generalized spectrum and $e_\gamma$ a generalized projector on the eigenstate basis. You will compute now products like $e_\gamma(t) e_\lambda(t+dt)$ with time coordinate $t$. Such products you have to define and in general, these are some higher rank tensors.

At the end you will get a path integral very similar to the ordinary one, but with integrals over the generalized state basis (due to insertion of the $\sum_{\lambda \in \Gamma}$). However, if such a spectral theorem can not be applied, the path integral cannot be defined rigorously.

answered Mar 24, 2017 by (40 points)

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOverf$\varnothing$owThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.