• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

203 submissions , 161 unreviewed
4,996 questions , 2,153 unanswered
5,340 answers , 22,632 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
813 active unimported users
More ...

  In a spinning electron, does charge rotate faster than mass or viceversa?

+ 0 like - 1 dislike

Schwinger showed that for a charged elementary fermion, the g-factor obeys g/2 = 1 + alpha / 2*pi + O(alpha^2) .

Given that g/2 is the ratio between the "charge rotation" and the "mass rotation", the expression should imply that charge rotates faster than mass (assuming that both have the same spatial distribution). Is this correct?  Or is it the other way round?

Closed as per community consensus as the post is not graduate-level
asked Mar 10, 2017 in Closed Questions by Bert [ revision history ]
recategorized Mar 11, 2017 by Dilaton

Schwinger calculated the anomalous magnetic moment of electron, not of any fermion. Proton and neutron have quite significant anomalous magnetic moments, which are calculable.

A macroscopic solid body, bearing some charge, may have any ratio of the angular momentum to magnetic moment, but it does not mean that the charged parts move differently than uncharged ones. Vote to close.

I added "elementary" to the question, which I had implied but forgotten to state explicitly.

This is not graduate-level, voting to close.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights