# Under what conditions are topological edge/interface states immune to random disorder?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
87 views

Recent studies classified "intrinsic", "symmetry protected", and other topological properties of matter. The paper (Topological states in photonic systems) claims that "The transport of many topological interfacial states is immune to fabrication imperfections".

This is a really strong statement. When are topological edge/interface states immune to what disorder? I'm reminded of the IQHE experiment, showing that disorder affects the plateaus of hall conductance.And if disorder is large enough, it may change the value of hall conductance.(Reference?)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-03-05 22:13 (UTC), posted by SE-user Wilson Ko
retagged Mar 5, 2017
Hi Wilson, I further edited your question to try to ensure it makes sense to more people. If you are able to, please verify that I have not altered it from your intended meaning.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-03-05 22:13 (UTC), posted by SE-user JeopardyTempest
Hi, JeopardyTempest, thanks for your editing. I quote directly from the reference in case I didn't express clearly.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-03-05 22:13 (UTC), posted by SE-user Wilson Ko
Great! It's certainly something nowhere near my expertise/familiarity, but it sounds like a pretty solid question, so hopefully you'll find a few people who know enough about it to offer thoughts :-)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-03-05 22:13 (UTC), posted by SE-user JeopardyTempest
Usually, symmetry protected states remains stable unless the symmetry is explicitly broken, or the gap closes for some reason or another. In particular, one has to be vigilant with respect to time-dependent interactions, since those ones may easily generate excitations above the gap. In that case, the problem becomes model dependent (as far as I know). A good symmetry for protection is time-reversal invariance (TRI), since it is relatively easy to experimentally protect against magnetic effect (the main cause of breaking the TRI). This is the reason why superconducting state is stable.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-03-05 22:13 (UTC), posted by SE-user FraSchelle
Hi, FraSchelle, superconducting state is not necessarily topological, could provide some reference related?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-03-05 22:13 (UTC), posted by SE-user Wilson Ko

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.