Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

143 submissions , 120 unreviewed
3,899 questions , 1,377 unanswered
4,837 answers , 20,500 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
495 active unimported users
More ...

  Does this asymptotic series appear anywhere in physics?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
152 views

I recently discovered the following relation for arbitrary $d_r$:

$$     \lim_{k \to \infty}  \lim_{n \to \infty}\ \sum_{r=1}^n d_r \left(  f(\frac{k}{n}r)\frac{k}{n} \right) \sim  \underbrace{\frac{1}{\zeta(s)}   \sum_{r=1}^\infty  \frac{d_r}{r^s}}_{\text{removable singularity}}  \times \int_0^\infty f(x) \, dx  $$

As $s \nearrow 1$ and $\int f(x) dx$ absolutely converges and $f(\infty)= f(0) = 0$

Some obvious choices are $d_r= 1$ , $d_r = s^r r^s$ or $d_r = \frac{\delta_{1,r}}{s-1}$ where the R.H.S $\neq 0$. Is there any possible use of this? (I was thinking along the lines of divergent series in QFT). I know this relation looks very bizzare so I've added a proof:

Proof
---

Consider an integral such that $$ \int_0^\infty f(x) \, dx = C,$$where, $f(x)$ is a smooth and continuous function and absolutely converges.

Now we raise both sides to the power s:

$$\left(\int_0^\infty f(x) \, dx\right)^s = C^s $$

We substitute $x$ with $rx$ to get:

$$\left(\int_0^\infty f(rx) \, dx\right)^s = (C/r)^s $$

Multiplying both sides by an arbitrary coefficient:

$$ (b_r)\left(\int_0^\infty f(rx) \, dx\right)^s = (b_r)( C/r)^s $$

Taking their sum:

$$ \sum_{r=1}^\infty b_r \left(\int_0^\infty f(rx) \, dx\right)^s = C^s \underbrace{\sum_{r=1}^\infty \frac{b_r}{r^s}}_{\text{dirichlet series}}   $$

We write the integral as a limit of a Riemann sum:

$$ \sum_{r=1}^\infty  \lim_{k \to \infty} \lim_{n \to \infty}\ b_r \left( \sum_{x=1}^n f(\frac{kx}{n}r)\frac{k}{n} \right)^s  = C^s \sum_{r=1}^\infty \frac{b_r}{r^s} $$

Using the mobius inversion formula:

$$ \sum_{r=1}^\infty  \lim_{k \to \infty} \lim_{n \to \infty}\ b_r \left( \sum_{x=1}^n f(\frac{kx}{n}r)\frac{k}{n} \right)^s  = C^s \frac{1}{\zeta(s)}\sum_{r=1}^\infty \frac{d_r}{r^s} $$


We define $ d_r = \sum_{e|r} b_e $

Note:

$$ (\frac{b_1}{1^s} + \frac{b_2}{2^s} + \frac{b_3}{3^s} + \frac{b_4}{4^s} + \dots) \times (\frac{1}{1^s} + \frac{1}{2^s} + \frac{1}{3^s} + \frac{1}{4^s} + \dots) = \frac{b_1}{1^s}  + \frac{b_1 + b_2}{2^s} + \frac{b_1 + b_3}{3^s} + \frac{b_1 + b_2 + b_4}{4^s} + \dots $$

Now focusing on the L.H.S ($s \nearrow  1 $):

$$ \sum_{r=1}^\infty  \lim_{k \to \infty} \lim_{n \to \infty}\ b_r \left( \sum_{x=1}^n f(\frac{kx}{n}r)\frac{k}{n} \right)^s \sim \sum_{r=1}^\infty  \lim_{k \to \infty} \lim_{n \to \infty}\ b_r \left( \sum_{x=1}^n f(\frac{kx}{n}r)\frac{k}{n} \right) $$


Focusing on the R.H.S of the asymptote:

$$ \lim_{n \to \infty} b_1 ((f(\frac{k}{n}) + f(2 \frac{k}{n}) + f(3 \frac{k}{n}) +f(4 \frac{k}{n}) + \cdots)\frac{k}{n} $$
$$+$$
$$ \lim_{n \to \infty} b_2 (0.f(\frac{k}{n}) + f(2 \frac{k}{n}) + 0.f(3 \frac{k}{n}) +f(4 \frac{k}{n}) +\cdots) \frac{k}{n}$$
$$+$$
$$ \vdots $$
 
$$ = \lim_{n \to \infty} (\underbrace{b_1}_{d_1} (f(\frac{k}{n}) + \underbrace{(b_1 + b_2)}_{d_2}f(2 \frac{k}{n}) + \underbrace{(b_1 + b_3)}_{d_3}f(3 \frac{k}{n}) +\underbrace{(b_1 + b_2 + b_4)}_{d_4}f(4 \frac{k}{n}) + \cdots)\frac{k}{n} $$

Hence, for special $d_r$ the R.H.S converges:

$$     \lim_{k \to \infty}  \lim_{n \to \infty}\ \sum_{r=1}^n d_r \left(  f(\frac{k}{n}r)\frac{k}{n} \right) \sim \lim_{s \to 1} \underbrace{\frac{1}{\zeta(s)}   \sum_{r=1}^\infty  \frac{d_r}{r^s}}_{\text{removable singularity}}  \times \int_0^\infty f(x) \, dx  $$
    

asked Jan 15 in Mathematics by Asaint (30 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jan 15 by Arnold Neumaier

 Is there any possible use of this? - Most likely the way you arrived at the consideration of this realtion hints at where possible uses are. How did you discover the formula?

Long answer: I arrived at this via consideration of a certain basis and realized that I could create this formula. Short answer: pure mathematics (which I was hoping could be applied to something). Also one of my friends said it might be useful for some path integral as it is essentially a limit of a sum of some kind.

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Let me quickly brainstorm at what this might be useful for in physics. Let us first take the n limit of the expression

$$     \lim_{k \to \infty}  \lim_{n \to \infty}\ \sum_{r=1}^n d_r \left(  f(\frac{k}{n}r)\frac{k}{n} \right)   $$

This is simply a Riemann integral which reads

$$\lim_{k \to \infty} \int_0^\infty \mathcal{D}(x) f(k x) k \mathrm{d}x$$

where $\mathcal{D}(x)$ will be some kind of horrible random distribution of the sort of white noise. What I mean by horrible is that it can be obtained as an infinitely tight packing of delta functions which have the value $d_r$ at the respective limiting points. By a simple substitution we can rewrite this integral as

$$\lim_{k \to \infty} \int_0^\infty \mathcal{D}(\frac{x}{k}) f(x) \mathrm{d}x \equiv \int_0^\infty \tilde{\mathcal{D}}(x) f(x) \mathrm{d}x$$

which only increases the tight-packing of the peaks of $\mathcal{D}$ to a new formal distribution $\tilde{\mathcal{D}}$.

Hence, in principle, I guess this kind of formula might be useful to consider in the following type of situation. We have a stochastic-differential process characterized by $\tilde{\mathcal{D}}(x) $, and we are able to step-by-step derive the properties of the sequence $d_r$; we can then use your formula e.g. to compute some $f(x)$-momenta or mean values of some observables.

answered Jan 16 by Void (1,505 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jan 16 by Void

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...