Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,853 answers , 20,624 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Calculating minimal altitude to start a "Suicide Burn" with non-constant maximum thrust.

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
121 views

I'm trying to calculate the absolute lowest altitude to start burning the engines at full power on a simulated spacecraft so that it will just reach v=0 at the surface of a planet.

The twist here is that the thrust provided by the engines responsible for descelerating is dependent on the thickness of the atmosphere they're in, which in turn depends on the altitude they are at.

Drag is not to be taken into account.

Craft mass does not vary during descent.

Craft falls straight down.

Thrusters providing desceleration are pointed straight down along the gravity vector.

Data available:

planet g: 9.81m/s^2  (variation by altitude is insignificant at practical altitude).

Atmosphere density: Altitude = 0m -> AtmDens = 1     |     Altitude = 14400m -> AtmDens = 0

Thruster efficiency: AtmDens = 1 -> ThrustEff = 1     |     AtmDens = 0.3 -> ThrustEff = 0

CraftAltitude above surface: xSurf     is known at any time

CraftAltitude above seaLevel: xSea     is known at any time

CraftVelocity (downwards): vCraft     is known at any time

CraftMass: mCraft     is known and constant at any time

CraftMaxThrust at seaLevel: cMaxThrustSea     is known at any time (in Newton)

What I came up with (so it could be wrong):

CraftMaxThrust at xSea in Newton:

cMaxThrustSea - (cMaxThrustSea / 100) * ((100 / 0.7) * (1 - (1 - xSea / 14400)))

I figure I'm looking for some differential equation that returns an altitude. I try looking at the problem from the bottom up, as to have an initial acceleration at least, but have failed to solve it so far.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Closed by author request
asked Nov 21, 2016 in Closed Questions by daquicker (0 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Nov 22, 2016 by Dilaton

This is not a graduate-level+ question; I am therefore voting to close this here.

However, it might be on-topic in the appropriate section of PhysicsForums.

If you prefer Q&A style discussions and as your question is not bad as such (just not on-topic for PO), it would be welcome on this new physicsproblems site

http://physicsproblems.nfshost.com/

as one of their administrators told me.





user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...