• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

202 submissions , 160 unreviewed
4,981 questions , 2,140 unanswered
5,339 answers , 22,619 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
813 active unimported users
More ...

  How to show that the polyakov action of a massless particle is conformally invariant?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

I am trying to show that the Polyakov action of a massless particle in a $D$ dimensional Minkowski spacetime $$S=\int d\tau(e^{-1}\dot{x}^{\mu}\dot{x}^{\nu}\eta_{\mu\nu})$$
is invariant under the conformal transformation generated by a vector field $\xi$ in the Minkowski spacetime, i.e. $\mathcal{L}_{\xi}\eta=\lambda\eta$, where $\mathcal{L}_{\xi}$ is the Lie derivative.

It turns out that in order to have conformal invariance, the auxiliary field $e$ has two transform in the following way:
But the above transformation is counter-intuitive to me. I cannot understand the physical or geometrical meaning of that transformation. Why should the field $e$ transform in that way under conformal transformation?

asked Oct 3, 2016 in Theoretical Physics by XIaoyiJing (50 points) [ revision history ]

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Using the explicit for of the conformal Killing vector you can see that the divergence vanishes for translations and Lorentz rotations,  but it is not zero for dilations. 

So, the transformation accounts for the contraction of the volume under those conformal transformations that change it. 

answered Oct 3, 2016 by anonymous [ no revision ]

Could you elaborate? What do you mean by "contraction of the volume under those conformal transformations that change it"?

Some of the conformal transformations rescale the volume. The divergence measures this effect, which is is then taken into account as a compensating transformation for the auxiliary field

Why does auxiliary field transform as a compensation of the rescaling effect?

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights