Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,862 answers , 20,637 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

Definition of a neutral/indifferent orbital stable systems

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
76 views

Dear Physicsoverflow members,

I'm currently working on a thesis about the COT, merit of walking, stability and robustness of little walking machines called passive dynamic walkers. For this thesis need to explain different kinds of stability. First, I described static stability followed by orbital or cyclic stability. For static stability, a system can be stable, unstable or neutral or indifferent. When translating these concepts to orbital stability, I, however, run into a problem. It was not so hard to define the meaning of systems that are orbitally stable or unstable, but a neutral or indifferent orbital system was a little harder to imagine. In static stability an indifferent stable system can be visualised as a ball on a levelled surface when you perturb it by applying a force it simple moves a little en then stops. How can I understand this in the context of orbital or periodic motions?

After a search on google I found this definition:

"Neutral orbital stability of an isolated equilibrium point for an autonomous system of differential equations obtains if all solutions sufficiently close to the equilibrium point remain close to that equilibrium point as
"timageimage."

What does this mean when a neutral orbital stable is perturbed?

Thanks a lot in advance,

Greetings Rick,

asked Jun 15, 2016 in General Physics by solomous (0 points) [ revision history ]
reshown Jun 15, 2016 by solomous

When a neutral orbital stable point in 2D is perturbed it may becomes a small periodic motion around the stable point.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...