Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,928 questions , 1,396 unanswered
4,846 answers , 20,597 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Why do we care about simplicity of the spectrum in Oseledets' theorem?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
83 views

Oseledets' theorem is a fundamental result in Ergodic theory (see for example here, or Chapter 4 of Lectures on Lyapunov Exponents by Marcelo Viana).

The simplicity of the spectrum has been studied by Guivarc'h and Raugi '86, Gol'dsheid and Margulis '89, Bonatti-Viana '04, Avila-Viana '07 and very recently by Mauricio Poletti.

My* questions are: What is the importance of having simplicity of the spectrum? Is it there any physical property that translates into simplicity of the spectrum?

In order to be specific about the question, I include a formal theorem of the simplicity of spectrum.

Let $(M,\mathcal B, \mu)$ be a complete separable probability space. Let $F:M\times \mathbb R^d\to M\times \mathbb R^d$ be a linear cocycle, i.e. $F(x,v):=(f(x),A(x)v)$, defined by a measurable function $A:M\to GL(d)$ over a measurable function $f:M\to M$ that preserves $\mu.$ By Oseledets' theorem we have that for $\mu$-a.e. $x\in M$ there is $k=k(x),$ numbers $\lambda_1(x)>\cdots>\lambda_k(x)$ and flags $\mathbb{R}^d=V_x^1\supsetneq \cdots \supsetneq V_x^k \supsetneq \{0\},$ such that for all $i=1,\ldots,k:$

  1. k(f(x))=k(x) and $\lambda_i(f(x))=\lambda_i(x)$ and $A(x)V_x^i=V_{f(x)}^i;$
  2. the map $x\mapsto k(x)$ and $x\mapsto \lambda_i(x)$ and $x\mapsto V_x^i$ are measurable; and
  3. $\lim_n \frac{1}{n}\log\|A^n(x)v\|=\lambda_i(x)$ for all $v\in V_x^i\setminus V_x^{i+1}.$

Formal theorem: Under a $\star$ condition, that depends on $(M,\mu,F),$ for $\mu$-a.e. $x\in M,$ we have that $d=k(x).$

*The first question was originally asked yesterday, in other terms, by Mario Ponce. I had this question at almost the same time, but I am still curious about the answer, this is the reason I dediced to ask it here.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2016-05-07 13:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user user39115
asked May 3, 2016 in Theoretical Physics by user39115 (20 points) [ no revision ]
retagged May 7, 2016
Certainly this is a big deal if $d=2$ and $A\colon M\to SL(2)$. In this case, the system is (non-uniformly) hyperbolic.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2016-05-07 13:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user Anthony Quas

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...