Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Do we need a limit on the length of comments?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
1185 views

I just noticed that the lengths of comments is limited. I had written a longish comment and had to break it over three consecutive comments to deal with the length limit. Of course now that I know about the length limit, I will avoid writing long comments in the future. But is there a reason for the length limit? Is it desirable? Is it something that is within our control or is it a restriction that is hardcoded into StackExchange?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Sep 16, 2011 in SE.TP.discussion by Gustav Delius (540 points) [ no revision ]

2 Answers

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

This is certainly not something that any of us can change, and must be done by the SE people if it is to be done at all. That said, I suspect they wouldn't want to change it for various different reasons: uniformity across the network, philosophical beliefs about the role of comments, etc.

To be honest, I think I agree with their limit. It's enough to allow for substantial comments, but not too much. I occasionally go way past the limit too, and have to break comments up over a couple of posts, but my feeling is that they would rather this not happen too often, to discourage extended discussion.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 16, 2011 by Joe Fitzsimons (3,575 points) [ no revision ]
+ 5 like - 1 dislike

To quote from the community faq:

Comments are intentionally short with a maximum of 600 characters [...]

When should comments be used?

Comments should be used for meta-discussion about a post which does not contribute to the content of the post directly. They are sometimes used to point out factual errors in a post, or to discuss subjective issues. Often, comments are used to address the user who created the post with a question or... well, comment.

Comments should not be used when creating an answer to a question. In that case it is best to submit an answer, or vote up the best answer if you already see it listed.

A comment of more than 600 characters length is most likely already half an answer and should be posted as such. If the comment limit really is too short to clarify details on the question/answer, the problem is possibly the post itself and not the limit. In that (hopefully rare) case it's probably better to invite the OP to a chat room. If you oppose to another answer, you can still post a new answer clarifying on that and leave a comment simply linking to your answer.


edit I see you're referring to comments on your own answer. For that case I suggest editing your answer, maybe quoting the objecting comment as well - the SE team is sometimes rather enthusiastic to delete longer comment discussions, although I think there is also a feature to automatically move longer discussion trails to chat.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Sep 16, 2011 by Tobias Kienzler (260 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ys$\varnothing$csOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...