• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,079 questions , 2,229 unanswered
5,348 answers , 22,758 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
819 active unimported users
More ...

  Boundary condition for holographic Green's function

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

I understand that to obtain retarded Green's function using AdS/CFT one needs to put ingoing wave boundary condition at the horizon, when one is considering a finite temperature system.

For system at zero temperature there is no black hole in the AdS. Still people use ingoing wave boundary condition (or pick the solution of the corresponding Euclidean equation of motion which is regular everywhere in the interior and analytically continue that solution to get the solution to the original Minkowski problem.).

My question is following. Suppose I have a geometry (i.e, a metric) that solves Einstein's equations with negative cosmological constant. It is asymptotically AdS but not a black hole. Now it may allow solutions to the EOM for the field which are both regular in the interior (for the Euclidean case, say). In this situation what will be the natural boundary condition to obtain retarded Green's function?

EDIT : I have a silly confusion about regularity. To be regular should a function must vanish at the "centre" of the space? Or it can take only finite values in the interior and may not vanish at the "centre"..

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-11-22 02:32 (UTC), posted by SE-user Physics Moron
asked Nov 21, 2015 in Mathematics by Physics Moron (285 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights