Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,851 answers , 20,616 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Free probability in Physics

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
86 views

Recently I have started reading some materials on non-commutative probability. IN this area mathematicians sometimes consider quantum theory as a non-commutative version of classical probability, with some extra conditions. With this starting point axiomatic version of quantum field theory has also been tried to construct. Based on tensor product types, bosonic and fermionic systems come up naturally. I want to know about the third type of noncommutative probability, i.e. free probability. This has been introduced by Voiculescu to attack the free group factor isomorphism problems. Is there any physical significance of free probability? Does there exists any connections between free probability and some physical systems (like symmetric and antisymmetric tensor product had with bosonic and fermionic systems).

Advanced thanks for any reply. Also please provide some references (paper or books), which describes such connection(s), if exists,

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-09-02 17:39 (UTC), posted by SE-user RSG
asked Aug 22, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by RSG (35 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Sep 2, 2015
In case you haven't seen it, Terence Tao's notes on free probability seem a good introduction: terrytao.wordpress.com/2010/02/10/245a-notes-5-free-probability. The following link is about free probability and quantum information theory, not physical processes, but it may be of interest: perimeterinstitute.ca/videos/….

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-09-02 17:39 (UTC), posted by SE-user Ernie

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$w
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...