• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

174 submissions , 137 unreviewed
4,308 questions , 1,640 unanswered
5,089 answers , 21,602 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
635 active unimported users
More ...

  Quantum entropy function from AdS/CFT?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

My question is about the AdS/CFT correspondence's place in calculating Sen's quantum entropy functions. In 2008 Sen gave a way to calculate the exact entropy of certain supersymmetric quantum black holes. In particular extremal RN black holes in 4D. Those are asymptotically isometric to $AdS^2\times S^2$. It is a development on Wald's calculation for classical gravity theories with higher derivatives in their lagrangian. The crux is caculating the expectation of a -regularized- boundary Wilson line in the quantized bulk gravity on the near-horizon $AdS^2\times S^2$. He seems to be using the AdS$^2$/CFT$^1$ correspondence but I cannot really see where.

Later articles by Dabholkar, Gomes, Murthy, et al. used localization to compute the bulk functional integral exactly as a finite dimensional integral, following Banerjee et al. But there the functional integral is over bulk fields -vector multiplets, hypermultiplets, Weyl multiplet. I cannot see where the AdS/CFT correspondence enters. Is it just a matter of taking certain limits on couplings without really considering the boundary CFT?

Furthermore if the AdS/CFT correspondence enters does it make sense to speak of a macroscopic calculation of the entropy, because passing to the boundary CFT is essentially passing (modulo a few "passage to the limit"s in between) to the brane worldvolume theory, which represents the microscopic degrees of freedom of string theory? So the quantum entropy function would better be called a different microscopic calculation of the straightforward original logarithm of the brane partition function. If this were the case would it not be better to speak of entropy computed in different frames (the weakly coupled IIB string frame near the horizon, the weakly coupled large N IIB brane frame, etc.)? It is not always a microscopic calculation if 1 passes by brane theories? I would believe macroscopic refers to spacetime string fields, entering lagrangians with arbitrarily high derivatives.

I am a little puzzled so any comment may enlighten me. Sorry if I wrote nonsense.

Main reference: arXiv:0805.0095, arXiv:0905.2686arXiv:1012.0265arXiv:1111.1161.

asked Aug 1, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by plm (30 points) [ no revision ]

Please log in or register to answer this question.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights