Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,851 answers , 20,616 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Fermion version of Gauss-Milgram sum?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
152 views

For Bosonic topological order, a very useful formula was proved to be true:

$\sum_a d_a^2 \theta_a=\mathcal{D} \exp(\frac{c_-}{8}2\pi i) $

(for more detail: $d_a$ is the quantum dimension of anyon labeled by a, and $\theta_a$ is the topological spin.D is the total quantum dimension, $\mathcal{D}^2=\sum_a d_a^2$. And $c_-$ is the chiral central charge. If we assume bulk boundary correspondence, $c_-$ can be defined as $c_-=c_L-c_R$, the chiral combination of the central charge of boundary CFT. Alternatively, the chiral central charge is also well defined without referring to CFT, that is via the thermal Hall effect when we have an edge termination.)

So my question is straightforward: what's the fermionic version of this formula?


This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-06-28 18:32 (UTC), posted by SE-user Yingfei Gu

asked Jun 23, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Yingfei Gu (105 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jun 28, 2015 by Dilaton

Nice question. What do you mean by fermionic version though?

Hi Ryan, I just consulted Meng Cheng about a precise statement of fermionic topological order: there is a fermion in the particle content, which braid trivially with everyone else. And obviously this particle makes the tensor category not modular. So we need a new formalism to work with. 

And a fermionic version of this formula means an equation whose left hand consists of data like topological spins and quantum dimensions of each anyon, and right hand consists of e.g. total quantum dimension and chiral central charge. So that we can read out the chiral central charge up to some integer from the formula, just like Gauss-Milgram.

I don't know how correct it is field-theoretically to include the electron as a quasiparticle. I would believe some formula like this exists for 3d spin TQFTs with the modularity constraint $Z(S^2) = \mathbb{C}$.

The previous Gauss-Milgram formula is derived via modular symmetry. So field theoretically, we need to use restricted modular group, which preserve spin structure. 

BTW, could you remind me why $Z(S^2)=\mathbb{C}$ is related to modularity?

$Z(S^2)$ is the space of point operators in the theory. If there are non-trivial point operators, then they can be inserted with their inverse on a non-trivial Wilson line and used to "open it up". Such a Wilson line will have trivial braiding with everyone else because you can use this trick to unlink it from anything. I don't believe $Z(S^2) = \mathbb{C}$ implies modularity, but it approximates it. Anyway I think you should look up the Landsberg-Schaar relation and see the formula for the partition function of the BF theory in my paper http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.2926 . It seems like your formula above is best understood via these formulas and the 4d anomaly theory of Chern-Simons.

1 Answer

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

We just posted a paper http://arxiv.org/abs/1507.04673 addressing this issue. For fermion topological orders, the fermionic version of this formula is $\Theta=\sum_a d_a^2 \theta_a=0$. See eq. 14 of the paper. So we cannot use eq. 14 to compute the chiral central charge of the fermionic topological orders. We have to use the bosonic extension of the fermionic topological orders to computer the chiral central charge of the fermionic topological orders.

answered Aug 8, 2015 by Xiao-Gang Wen (3,319 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$y$\varnothing$icsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...