Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

146 submissions , 123 unreviewed
3,953 questions , 1,403 unanswered
4,889 answers , 20,762 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
507 active unimported users
More ...

Computation of the QCD vector two point function

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
366 views

I am following some notes on the computation of the vector two point function in QCD and I would like somebody to make some intermediate steps more explicit. Let's consider

$$\Pi_{\mu\nu}=i\mu^{2\epsilon}\int{}d^dx\,{}e^ {iqx}\langle\Omega|T\{j_{\mu}(x)j_{\nu}(0)\}|\Omega\rangle=(q_{\mu}q_{\nu}-\eta_{\mu\nu}q^2)\Pi,$$

where $\mu$ is a mass scale, $\epsilon$ is the regulator defined in $d=4-2\epsilon$ where $d$ is the dimensionality of space-time and $j_{\mu}(x)=\bar{q}(x)\gamma_{\mu}q(x)$.

The quantity I want to compute is $\Pi$. To do that we first multiply the equation above with $\eta^{\mu\nu}$ on both sides to obtain

$$\Pi=\frac{-i\mu^{2\epsilon}}{(d-1)q^2}\int{}d^dx\,{}e^ {iqx}\langle\Omega|T\{j_{\mu}(x)j^{\mu}(0)\}|\Omega\rangle=\ldots$$

My notes claim that this leads to

$$\ldots=\frac{-iN_c\mu^{2\epsilon}}{(d-1)q^2}\int{}d^dx\,{}e^ {iqx}Tr[S(x)\gamma_{\mu}S(-x)\gamma^{\mu}],$$

where $N_c$ is the number of colors and $S(x)$ is the free quark propagator.

I want somebody to make the steps between the last two equations explicit, particularly I am interested on where do the traces come from.

asked May 9, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Dmitry hand me the Kalashnikov (720 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

This is a tree level result, just write $\langle\Omega|T\{j_{\mu}(x)j^{\mu}(0)\}|\Omega\rangle$ explicitly in terms of quark field operators, and note that quark operators carry both spinor indices and color indices. Then do Wick contractions as usual. Do not contract two quark fields in the same current since by symmetry  $\langle\Omega|T\{j_{\mu}(x)\}|\Omega\rangle$ must be renormalized/normally ordered to  0. The trace will naturally appear as a result of contracting indices, in fact the trace will be over both color and spinor indices. The color part of the trace is quite trivial, it's just a trace over an $N_c\times N_c$ identity matrix, hence a factor $N_c$ appears as an overall coefficient and you are left with only the spinor trace. You may have seen these in similar QED calculations, it's exactly the same story.

answered May 9, 2015 by Jia Yiyang (2,505 points) [ revision history ]
edited May 9, 2015 by Arnold Neumaier

@Jia Yiyang, can you please elaborate more one the fact that we need only take contraction of fields at different spacetime points?

@silvrfuck, when you contract within the same current, you are essentially calculating $\langle\Omega|j_{\mu}(0)|\Omega\rangle$. Due to Lorentz invariance of the vacuum, we have

 $\langle\Omega|U^{-1}(\Lambda)j_{\mu}(0)U(\Lambda)|\Omega\rangle=\langle\Omega|j_{\mu}(0)|\Omega\rangle$. On the other hand,  $U^{-1}(\Lambda)j_{\mu}(0)U(\Lambda)=\Lambda^{\nu}_{\ \mu}j_\nu(0)$, hence we conclude $\langle\Omega|j_{\mu}(0)|\Omega\rangle= \Lambda^{\nu}_{\ \mu}\langle\Omega|j_\nu(0)|\Omega\rangle$, and this can only be true if $\langle\Omega|j_{\mu}(0)|\Omega\rangle=0$. You should take this as a kind of renormalization condition.  

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$Overflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...