Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,852 answers , 20,624 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Are there non-supersymmetric and/or non-Calabi-Yau topological sigma models?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
62 views

I am reading some aspects of Mirror Symmetry and in mirror symmetry the $N=2$ SCFT on a Calabi Yau Manifold can be divided into two sectors each of which is a topological sigma model, A-Model and B-Model. After some research through some literature about the topological models, it seems that the topological models are constructed only on supersymmetric theory.

Are there any non -Supersymmetric topological sigma models?

Are there some topological models where the target space is not a Calabi-Yau manifold (or in general a Kahler manifold)?

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-04-04 12:48 (UTC), posted by SE-user J Verma
asked Nov 1, 2010 in Theoretical Physics by J Verma (270 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Apr 4, 2015
I have made two small edits, both to aid other readers. First, I have changed two periods into question marks — this post does include two questions, but a "question mark" really does mark a sentence as a question for people skimming. Second, I have modified the title to encapsulate the thrust of the question, and set it in the form of a question.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-04-04 12:48 (UTC), posted by SE-user Theo Johnson-Freyd
@Theo Thanks for your edits.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-04-04 12:48 (UTC), posted by SE-user J Verma

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

I believe that A-model does not require a Calabi-Yau target space. In fact, A-model is well-defined on any almost complex manifold, which was Witten's original construction (Comm. Math. Phys. Volume 118, Number 3 (1988), 411-449). On the other hand, B-model can only be defined on a Calabi-Yau manifold, which follows from anomaly cancelation.

In general, topological field theories have many different types (not necessarily supersymmetric). As an example, Chern-Simons theory is topological. Try http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topological_quantum_field_theory for some general discussion.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-04-04 12:48 (UTC), posted by SE-user Moduli
answered Nov 13, 2010 by Moduli (20 points) [ no revision ]
@ Moduli thanks for the answer..actually I am reading the Witten's topological twisting paper where he constructs A and B-models from a $N=2$ SCFT on a Kahler manifold, and the topological nature of A-model depends on the Kahler class on the target manifold. Can you suggest some references to look at A and B-models in generality.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-04-04 12:48 (UTC), posted by SE-user J Verma
A-model was discovered ealier than B-model. The original A-model paper (in whihc the name "A-model" has not been invented yet) is the one I gave. I am guessing the paper you are reading is the classic one "Mirror Manifolds And Topological Field Theory" (hep-th/9112056). If so, it was pointed out in that paper that A-model can be defined on almost complex manifolds, while B-model can only be defined on a Calabi-Yau manifold, which follows from anomaly cancelation.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-04-04 12:48 (UTC), posted by SE-user Moduli
@ Moduli ya you are right, I am reading the same paper you mentioned. I am under the impression (correct if I am wrong), that you need Kahler target manifold for $N=2$ Supersymmetry. And the other paper you mentioned is "Topological Sigma model", I always look through this paper on my laptop, But never read it. Do you suggest reading it, for the better understanding of the paper I am reading. I was just wondering,if there is some better,easy to read, review of sigma models in general and topological models in particular. Thanks

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-04-04 12:48 (UTC), posted by SE-user J Verma

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysi$\varnothing$sOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...