Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,873 answers , 20,701 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

Generalized Hawking Mass

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
177 views

This is a fairly general question. Let $(M^3,g)$ be a Riemannian 3-manifold. Let $\Sigma^2$ be a dimension-2 submanifold of $M$. The Hawking mass of $\Sigma^2$ is defined as

$m(\Sigma^2) := \frac{|\Sigma^2|}{64\pi^{3/2}}(16\pi - \int_{\Sigma^2} H^2)$.

A lot is known about the Hawking mass. My question is, has there been any work done to generalize the Hawking mass to higher dimensions? Is there anything known about a higher-dimensional Hawking mass?


This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-03-27 18:53 (UTC), posted by SE-user Michael Pinkard

asked Oct 10, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Michael Pinkard (30 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 27, 2015 by Dilaton
Most voted comments show all comments
Have you tried asking Carla? (If you are in Tuebingen her office should be somewhere near.)

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-03-27 18:53 (UTC), posted by SE-user Willie Wong
Good answer! I did, but she doesn't know, that's why I decided to ask math overflow.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-03-27 18:53 (UTC), posted by SE-user Michael Pinkard
One possibility is that you can start with the characterisation of the Hawking mass in spherical symmetry as the "flux relative to the Kodama vector field" and see if it leads you to anything. For the standard 3+1 case you can see the computations on my blog (scroll down a little to the section titled "Kodama vector field"). But whatever it is it should probably agree with the mass of higher dimensional Schwarzschild.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-03-27 18:53 (UTC), posted by SE-user Willie Wong
For the usual formula, one thing you need to contend with is the $16\pi$ term inside the parentheses: more generally that term is/should be proportional to the Euler characteristic of your two surface $\Sigma$, and arises actually from Gauss-Bonnet and integrating scalar curvature (so the formula you gave is arguably not the correct definition for higher genus surfaces). The higher dimensional Gauss-Bonnet is more complicated, so ...

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-03-27 18:53 (UTC), posted by SE-user Willie Wong

@Prathyush \(\Sigma^2\) is the closed two-dimensional surface you're calculating the Hawking mass of. H is the mean curvature of \(\Sigma^2\).

@Prathyush Yes, that's right, \(|\Sigma^2|\) is the area of \(\Sigma^2\) the surface. The mean curvature \(H\) is just another measure of curvature that is the mean of the principal curvatures, see the wikipedia page. To ping me with each edit, just place one more ping with each edit, like I did here in this comment.

Most recent comments show all comments
Sorry I didn't respond earlier. Thanks for the link to the blog post, it's interesting and I'll definitely dig into it further!

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-03-27 18:53 (UTC), posted by SE-user Michael Pinkard

What's H and what's \(|\Sigma^2|(area?)\)

What do you mean mean curvature, It a local quantity its being integrated over. I was referring to the \(|\Sigma^2|\) in the formula, which is some number probably area.

@dimension10 I am not creating a barrage of comments, Ill just update this comment and i hope you get a ping each time I do so.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...