• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,079 questions , 2,229 unanswered
5,348 answers , 22,758 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
819 active unimported users
More ...

  'Topological' Notions in Physics

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

So I've been trying to make sense recently of the usage of 'topological' in various fields of physics, and get sort of an intuition for what this means in context. This all boils down to my main question - if the usage of topology indicates working in a general topological space - does it make sense not to have a metric in physics? The specific and most important example I'm trying to get my head around is Topological Quantum Field Theory - I'm wondering how this formulation of QFT somehow works without metrics and how one can get an intuition for that being possible in a physical context.

Apologies if the question is somewhat vague, as this reflects my understanding at this point on this topic, but any very general insight would be much appreciated.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-02-17 11:25 (UTC), posted by SE-user Schwinger
asked Oct 31, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Schwinger (20 points) [ no revision ]
I guess this question has been coming up more and more in my readings and I would really appreciate a stab at an answer - I read a review paper on higher spin gravity where they developed black holes the standard way and then used the Chern-Simons formulation to solve the same problem of calculating black hole entropy and temperature. So I guess I have some picture that maybe such an approach is more general but not different, but I'm not sure this is correct.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-02-17 11:25 (UTC), posted by SE-user Schwinger

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

The "topological" in "topological order" and the "topological" in "topological insulator" has different meanings.

The 'topological' in topological order means 'robust against ANY local perturbations'.

The "topological" in "topological insulator" means 'robust against some local perturbations that respect certain symmetry'. In fact the properties of symmetry-breaking order are also 'robust against some local perturbations that respect the symmetry'. In this sense, we may also call symmetry-breaking order "topological" (in the same sense we call topological insulator "topological").

There are two kinds of topology in math. The "topology" in "topological order" is directly related to the first kind of topology in mathematics, as in algebraic topology, homology, cohomology, tensor category, and topological quantum field theory. The "topology" in "topological insulator" is related to the second kind of topology in mathematics, as in mapping class, homotopy, K-theory, etc. The first kind of topology is algebraic, while the second kind of topology is related to the continuous manifold of finite dimensions. We may also say that the first kind of topology is "quantum", while the second kind of topology is "classical".

See Reconciling topological insulators and topological order

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-02-17 11:25 (UTC), posted by SE-user Xiao-Gang Wen
answered Feb 15, 2015 by Xiao-Gang Wen (3,485 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights