Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,848 answers , 20,603 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

What are the geometric interpretations of the electric and colour charges in string theory?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
179 views

(This will be a partially self-answered question)

In string theory, the mass of a particle is determined by the the both the bosonic modes of the string \(\alpha_\mu\), and the fermionic modes \(d_\mu \), through the number operator \(N=\sum\limits_{n=1}^\infty \alpha_{-n}\cdot\alpha_n+\sum\limits_{r/2=1}^\infty d_{-r}\cdot d_r\). On the contrary, the spin number of a particle is intepreted in relation to the fermionic modes of the string \(d_\mu \). This is interesting, because one could say that the mass is related to the vibration of the string, while the spin is related to the rotation, which is very meaningful. For instance, in the bosonic theory, spin is not explained, but the mass can be written in suitable natural units, as \(\sqrt{N-a}\) (the same expression holds with the superstring, but here there are non-zero fermionic modes). 

However, given that mass can be represented in such an elegant, geometric way, there should surely be a similiar geometric interpretation for, e.g., the electric charge, the colour charge, and the weak hypercharge. What are the various geometric interpretations of these, and how are they related (by stringy/QFT dualities)?

asked Jan 31, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by dimension10 (1,950 points) [ no revision ]

These SM groups usually arise as subgroups of a GUT group. 

@MitchellPorter I know that, but I was not really asking for the string theoretic origin of the charges, but rather if this had a convenient geometric interpretation like the electric charge, which is linked to the winding number of a closed oriented string about a compactified dimension. This interpretation is linked to the gauge group U(1) of electromagnetism, but the same interpretation does not hold for the colour charge, for instance.

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

I cannot speak about colour charge, but electric charge sure has a rather interesting geometric interpretation in string theory, in fact, two such interpretations that are equivalent through T-duality.

The first such interpretation is not unique to string theory, and is far from being stringy in nature. It's also present in Kaluza-Klein theory, and also supergravity. Namely, the electric charge is proportional to the momentum of the particle in one of the compactified, periodic dimensions. In other words, the observed electric charge is the number of times the particle oscillates, or "circulates" in this compactified dimension. This is also where the U(1) symmetry of electromagnetism arises. In heterotic string theory, this symmetry is unified into the larger \(\operatorname{Spin}(32)/\mathbb{Z}_2\) or \(E_8\times E_8 \) symmetry, which is a superset of \(U(1)\) symmetry.

The other interpretation is much more stringy in nature. That is, the electric charge is equivalent to, in a suitable choice of natural units, the winding number of the closed string. The sign of the charge is given by the direction of winding; this implies that only theories with closed oriented strings allow for this interpretation.

These two descriptions are T-dual to each other, in other words, they are equivalent descriptions, through T-duality.

answered Jan 31, 2015 by dimension10 (1,950 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jan 23, 2016 by dimension10

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsO$\varnothing$erflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...