Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,848 answers , 20,603 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Linear superposition and expectation values

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
153 views
When you make a linear superposition like this $\psi(\boldsymbol{r},t)=h^{-\frac{2}{3}}\int [C^{+}(\boldsymbol{p})e^{-i\omega t}+C^{-}(\boldsymbol{p})e^{i\omega t}]e^{(i\boldsymbol{p}\cdot\boldsymbol{r}/\hbar)}\, d^{3}\boldsymbol{p}$ where $\omega=\frac{1}{\hbar}(c^{2}p^{2}+m^{2}c^{4})^{\frac{1}{2}}$, the exponential factors are transparent to the integration?. And if I calculate the expectation value of the momentum gradient operator like this $<\hat{\boldsymbol{\nabla_{p}}}>=\int\int\,d^{3}\boldsymbol{p}\,d^{3}\boldsymbol{q}\,(\phi(\boldsymbol{q},t)\hat{\boldsymbol{\nabla_{p}}}\phi(\boldsymbol{p},t))$ where $\phi(\boldsymbol{p},t)=C^{+}(\boldsymbol{p})e^{-i\omega t}+C^{-}(\boldsymbol{p})e^{i\omega t}$ then, the gradient operator acts on the exponentials, being $\omega$ a function of $p$?
Closed as per community consensus as the post is Not graduate-level upwards
asked Jan 15, 2015 in Closed Questions by Calogero (0 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Jan 17, 2015 by dimension10
Most voted comments show all comments
It's really not clear what you are asking, please consider improve the wording,
@JiaYiyang I suppose he means "does the gradient operator act on the exponentials?". The answer seems to obviously be "yes".

This doesn't seem to be graduate-level+. Voting to close.

Yes, and if in the first equetion the exponentials can be pulled in front of the integral ...
Nothing can be pulled out of integral because of p-dependence. Vote to close.
Most recent comments show all comments
The quantum field operators is Fourier-decomposed in 4D $\omega - k$ space, when you integrate or differentiate only with respect to 3D momentum (or k respectively as $p=\hbar k$), the frequency part can be treated as constant.
Replace $\omega$ with its explicit -p-dependent expression. Generally, a function of four-coordinate $x$ can be represented as a four-dimensional Fourier integral where all variables $(\omega,\mathbf{p})$ are independent. But the formula above is not of this kind. Here the $\omega$-integration is already done - with help of a delta-function, so no omega exists anymore but a function of $p$.

By the way, the second expression (with gradient) is a symbolic one since the gradient should act on the operators $C^{\pm} (\mathbf{p})$. The whole expression makes sense when it is sandwiched between states and then the action of $C^{\pm} (\mathbf{p})$ gives functions of $\mathbf{p}$.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...