# Is there any "deep" relation between the localization theorem of equivariant cohomology and the localization theorem of equivariant K-theory

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
789 views

First let's consider equivariant cohomology: if a compact Lie group $G$ acts on a compact manifold $M$. We have the equivariant cohomology $H_G(M)$ defined as the cohomology of the cochain complex $((\mathbb{C}[\mathfrak{g^*}]\otimes \Omega^{\bullet}{M})^G, d_G)$ (for the definition of equivariant cohomology we can look at chapter 1 and 4 of Guillemin and Sternberg's book "Supersymmetry and Equivariant de Rham Theory"). $K< G$ is a closed subgroup, Let $M^K$ be the points of $M$ which has isotropy groups conjugated to $K$, obviously $M^K$ is a $G$-submanifold of $M$ and let $~i: M^K \rightarrow M$ denote the inclusion map. we have a version of localization theorem, see Guillemin and Sternberg's book "Supersymmetry and Equivariant de Rham Theory" chapter 11, especially Theorem 11.4.3 in page 178. In more details :

Consider the equivariant cohomology $H_G(M)$ and $H_G(M^K)$ as $S( \mathfrak{g^* })^G$ modules. Then the pullback map $$i^*: H^ * _G(M)\rightarrow H^ *_G(M^K)$$ is an isomorphism after localizing at some certain prime ideals of $S( \mathfrak{g^* })^G$.

On the other hand, we have the equivariant K-theory $K_G(M)$ and we also have the localization theorem in this side, see Segal "Equivariant K-theory" (1967) section 4, proposition 4.1, which also claims that Then the pullback map $$i^*: K^ * _G(M)\rightarrow K^ *_G(M^K)$$ is an isomorphism after localizing at some certain prime ideals of $R(G)$, the representation ring of $G$.

We notice the similarity of the above two version of localization theorems. Nevertheless equivariant cohomology and equivariant K-theory are different. The first is the cohomology of a differential graded algebra and the latter is the Grothedieck group of modules of the cross product algebra $G \ltimes C(M)$.

My question is: is there any deep relation between them? Are they valid because of the same reason?

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-11-20 20:24 (UTC), posted by SE-user Zhaoting Wei
asked Sep 10, 2012
retagged Nov 21, 2014
The localization theorem for equivariant K-theory is valid even when $G$ is a finite group. On the other hand, I think (correct me if I am wrong) that the localisation theorem for equivariant cohomology needs $G$ to have positive dimension to have a non-trivial content. This suggests that there is a conceptual difference between them.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-11-20 20:24 (UTC), posted by SE-user Damian Rössler
Thank you for your comments Damian! Yes, as far as I know the localization theorem is true essentially for compact abelian Lie groups.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-11-20 20:24 (UTC), posted by SE-user Zhaoting Wei
I'm still hoping someone who understands this better than me answers this, but... Yes - there is (at least in some cases) a "Chern map" taking (equivariant) vector bundles to their (equivariant) Chern classes, and this should be the relation you are looking for.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-11-20 20:24 (UTC), posted by SE-user Alexander Woo
@Alexander Thank you for your comment! Yes I think Chern character map may be the answer and there are a lot of interesting theory on it (for example the paper by J. Block and E. Getzler "Equivariant cyclic homology and equivariant differential forms"). I will think more carefully about this.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2014-11-20 20:24 (UTC), posted by SE-user Zhaoting Wei

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.