• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,037 questions , 2,191 unanswered
5,344 answers , 22,706 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Supersymmetric 1-loop vacuum amplitude and Special values of L-functions

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

The  zeta functions and L-functions of number theory are directly the arithmetic analogs of analytic regularization of traces of Feynman propagators (via the definition of zeta function of an elliptic differential operator). In particular the number theorist's special values of L-functions therefore correspond to 1-loop vacuum amplitudes and related quantities (vacuum energy, functional determinant, etc.) All ingredients of these analogies are well-known in the literature, though maybe the full statement is not advertized as widely as it ought to be. I have created a summary table here.

Now what is striking is that with these analogies, then vanishing of special values of zeta functions corresponds to vanishing of 1-loop vacuum amplitudes. 

But vanishing of special values of zeta functions is the content of the generalized Riemann hypothesis and the vanishing of 1-loop vacuum amplitudes is of key interest in the study of supersymmetric (string) vacua. There seems to be an intimate relation between the two.

My question is: where is this relation being investigated? 

One article in this direction that I am aware of is

  • Carlo Angelantonj, Matteo Cardella, Shmuel Elitzur, Eliezer Rabinovici, Vacuum stability, string density of states and the Riemann zeta function,JHEP 1102:024,2011 (arXiv:1012.5091)

Is there more?

I should say that I am of course aware of a large and growing body of literature which tries to connect the Riemann hypothesis to physics in some way. But, unless I am missing something, then what I see in most of these discussions does not really fit the table. Notably some authors try to identify the Riemann zeta function with the partition function of some quantum mechanical system. But following through the function field analogy etc. shows clearly that the Riemann zeta function is not analogous to a partition function, but to the Mellin transform of a partition function (integrating out what in physics is the Schwinger parameter) and hence really is analogous to the regularized 1-loop vacuum amplitude. Most of the literature which one finds when looking for "Riemann hypothesis and physics" seems to be oblivious of this relation. My question is specifically about literature which does make the relation between vanishing of special values of zeta functions/L-functions and vanishing of 1-loop vacuum amplitudes in physics.

asked Sep 2, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Urs Schreiber (6,095 points) [ revision history ]
edited Sep 2, 2014 by Urs Schreiber

Gordon Chalmers, Comment on the Riemann Hypothesis, arXiv:physics/0503141 has a connection to the vanishing of a 4-point amplitude.

Thanks for the pointer. I looked at it, but find it a bit hard to extract the statement. Are you aware of any further accounts of this idea? If it's just about looking at an explicit expression for the SYM 4-point function, then this must be well known elsewhere, too, I suppose.

I haven't seen anything else in this direction. But this doesn't mean that nothing exists, as this is a bit outside of the stuff I read comprehensively. 

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights