Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,862 answers , 20,637 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

Is it time for Reviews to be reorganized by category?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
536 views

Now that we have this snazzy category system (it's really unbelievable, thanks so much polarkernel), can we make the papers in the reviews section appear in the proper position of the arxiv category system they fall under? Have the view by category and date of publication, so that they are ordered from most recent to least. I think the enormously hard part of this change has just been finished.

This will make an incentive to import papers, because they won't seem so cramped and all alone on the reviews page. It will also make the site look professional for the views we will get after Dilaton's talk.

Also, and I was looking over the interface of Stack Exchange. Their interface is somewhat snazzier, and I thought that it might be possible to have something analogous to their personal user view, which shows prominently the reputation change, and the detailed sequence of votes that went into it. Further, separately, the comments and responses in a linear compressed list similar to what they do. Our current "updates" list is no good, it just lists things in the same format. Neither is totally urgent, but these superficial slight improvements can help with the user retention.

asked Aug 27, 2014 in Discussion by Ron Maimon (7,535 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Sep 10, 2014 by dimension10

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

I agree: There are currently 43 papers in reviews, and it's better to sort them out before it gets unmanagably large. It's always easier to sort 43 papers than 4300 ones. So I'd say we should start the recategorisation right away! But note that it will take time, especially in the beginning, when all the nested categories still need to be created.

To the moderators helping out in recategorisation (not the users): please check the "edit silently" checkbox before saving the edit, to avoid bursting the main page. Non-moderators do not have access to this checkbox, though. Also, the users would need to wait for the recategorising moderators to create a few nested categories to recategorise anything into.

And here's an example re-categorisation to demonstrate the hierarchial tag system. I deliberately did not check the "save silently" box, since it's also an example recategorisation,

answered Aug 27, 2014 by dimension10 (1,950 points) [ revision history ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...