Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,862 answers , 20,637 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

What potential between charges leads to confinement

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
120 views

In (2+1)-d, instanton effect leads to a linear potential between charges. If we have two particles with opposite charges in this case, since linear potential diverges when the distance between the two charges goes to infinity, it is energetically favorable to produce two more charged particles to neutralize the original two particles, instead of letting them separate as far as possible. This is basically the argument on confinement of (2+1)-d EM field.

It looks the essential element in this argument is the presence of a potential between charged particles which diverges when the distance goes to infinity, so does logarithmic potential lead to confinement? If so, we know that in (2+1)-d charges interact via a logarithmic potential, then why cannot we conclude that (2+1)-d EM field is confined without considering instanton effect?

I think the answer is no, so how strong should the potential be in order to have confinement?

asked Aug 24, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Mr. Gentleman (255 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

It's not in 2+1d linear EM field that there are instantons, rather in 2+1d nonlinear gauge theory. The 2+1 d free EM field is not confining, but has logarithmically rising potential, and a force that falls off as 1/r. The 1+1 d linear EM field is confining, this is the Schwinger model, but this is not a surprise as in 1d, the potential is automatically linear.

The logarithmic potential in 2+1d does mean that particles can't separate, but it is not the technical definition of a confining potential, which is that the particles should have a behavior similar to that of the 1+1d Schwinger model, that they are linked by a string with tension.

That's not a full answer, you presumably want to know what the spectrum of 2+1d QED looks like, is it all logarithmically confined positron states. I don't know the detailed spectrum of this theory, but it can be calculated, so it's a good question, but I think the question should be worded more clearly, so that it doesn't seem to be talking about instanton effects in QED. But +1, because I know what you mean.

answered Aug 24, 2014 by Ron Maimon (7,535 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...