Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,873 answers , 20,701 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

How to properly construct the electromagnetic tensor in curved space-time?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
245 views

I can't seem to get my results to match D'Inverno's electromagnetic tensor for a charged point (page 239 of his book - *Introducing Einstein's Relativity*).

Here are D'Inverno's steps:

- The line element in spherical coordinates is (\(\eta\) and \(\lambda\) are functions of \(r\) only)

\(\mathrm{d}s^2 = \mathrm{e}^\eta \mathrm{d}t^2 - \mathrm{e}^\lambda \mathrm{d}r^2 - r^2 (\mathrm{d}\theta^2 + \sin^2\!\theta\ \mathrm{d}\phi^2)\)

- He defines this covariant electromagnetic field tensor:

\(F_{\mu\nu} = E(r) \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\)

- He then proceeds to find the electric field, and consequently the electromagnetic field tensor by using the source-free Maxwell equations:

\(\begin{align} \nabla_\nu F^{\mu\nu} & = 0 \\ \partial_{[\lambda} F_{\mu\nu]} & = 0. \end{align}\)

- Solving the differential equation that appears from the equations above, he finds the electric field:

\(E(r) = \mathrm{e}^{(\eta+\lambda)/2} \varepsilon/r^2\)

- He then notes that this field is that of a point charge at infinity (\(\eta\) and \(\lambda\) go to zero at infinity) where \(\varepsilon\) is the electric charge. I managed to reproduce all these steps.

Now, here are my steps, using the four-potential procedure (the line element is the same):

- I define my contravariant four-potential (there is just the first element which is the electric potential of a point charge, just as D'Inverno found):

\(A^\mu = (\varepsilon/r, 0, 0, 0)\)

- Then I lower the index of this four-potential to find the covariant one:

\(A_\mu = (\mathrm{e}^\eta \varepsilon/r, 0, 0, 0)\)

- Finally I apply this equation to build the covariant electromagnetic tensor:

\(F_{\mu\nu} = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu\)

- The result is

\(F_{\mu\nu} = \frac{\mathrm{e}^\eta \varepsilon}{r^2}\! \left(r\frac{\partial\eta}{\partial r}-1\right) \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\)

- Where:

\(\frac{\mathrm{e}^\eta \varepsilon}{r^2}\! \left(r\frac{\partial\eta}{\partial r}-1\right) = E(r)\)

And this is different from D'Inverno's electric field. I don't know what I am doing wrong. The calculations are not difficult for this simple case.

The question is, due to these calculations:

Do my contravariant four-potential needs to contain my metric funcions in some way? I was assuming it is just the four-potential for a electric charge in the flat space:

\(A^\mu = (\varepsilon/r, 0, 0, 0)\)

If everything is right, the wrong assumption must be here.

asked Jul 23, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Giovanni [ no revision ]

The key is to understanding why $F_{\mu\nu}=e^{(\eta+\lambda)/2}\ \varepsilon/r^2$ must hold. This is a consequence of Gauss' law as you are looking for a solution with charge $\varepsilon$: $\int_{S^2_\infty} *F=4\pi \varepsilon$. Your choice for $A^\mu$ doesn't do that.

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

There is no reason to assume that the contravariant four-potential is the same as in flat space and it is not if you look to the final answer for the electric field.

As mentioned in the question, to compute the electric field one just has to solve Maxwell equations (and the answer is rather obvious if one uses the well-known formula for the divergence of some tensor $V_i$: $ \nabla^i V_i = \frac{1}{\sqrt{det(g)}} \partial_i (\sqrt{det(g)} g^{ij} V_j) $).

answered Jul 24, 2014 by 40227 (4,660 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jul 24, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier

As I suspected. Most books don't leave this explicitly... they just go on defining an electromagnetic tensor with the field components and that's all. I am just starting to learn GR. Thank you for your reply.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$low
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...