• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

204 submissions , 162 unreviewed
5,026 questions , 2,180 unanswered
5,344 answers , 22,686 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
815 active unimported users
More ...

  Operator Product Expansion in Massless 2D QED

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

In Peskin & Schroeder chapter 19 page 656, where the axial current anomaly of massless 2D QED is discussed, the authors go from: $$ \bar\psi(x+\varepsilon/2)\Gamma(x)\psi(x-\varepsilon/2)\tag{19.25} $$ (where $\Gamma(x)$ is some operator) to: $$ \bar\psi(x+\varepsilon/2)\Gamma(x)\psi(x-\varepsilon/2) \tag{19.27} $$ (where now the two Fermionic fields are contracted) to: $$ Tr\left[\Gamma(x)S_F(\varepsilon)\right] \tag{19.27} $$ (where $S_F(x)$ is the Fermion propagator between a spacetime interval $x$)

I really don't understand these transitions and would appreciate any help with how to do them. In particular:

1) Is it implicitly understood (from the very beginning of this derivation) that the axial current is in fact time-ordered (so that we can employ Wick's theorem) and always assume it operates on the vacuum (so that normal ordered terms vanish)?

2) Why does the contraction of the two Fermion fields over the $\Gamma$ operator lead to a trace, as if we had a loop?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-14 07:37 (UCT), posted by SE-user PPR
asked Jul 13, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by PPR (135 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Jul 14, 2014
Observe that the trace is invariant under cyclic permutation, this should give you the answer to your second question.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-14 07:37 (UCT), posted by SE-user ACuriousMind

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights