Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,862 answers , 20,637 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

What does this question about entanglement and classical geometry mean?

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
2301 views

Below is the question from Andy Strominger's presentation at the String 2014 conference. The question was asked by credible physicist Ashoke Sen as an important question.

"What is the precise relation between quantum entanglement and classical geometry?"

Could somebody describe the question and explain why it is an important question and its implications?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-11 16:32 (UCT), posted by SE-user Sbaniala
asked Jul 9, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by sbaniala (25 points) [ no revision ]
I wasn't there but one can guess this is a reference to the "ER=EPR" conjecture.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-11 16:32 (UCT), posted by SE-user SM Kravec
@SM Kravec. I do not think so. It is from a completely different context than EPR and the like..

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-11 16:32 (UCT), posted by SE-user Sbaniala
These kind of ideas (ER=EPR, etc...), to my knowledge, has begun with this paper of Mark Van Raamsdonk

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-07-11 16:32 (UCT), posted by SE-user Trimok

A link is slightly helpful (but less than I had hoped) for context: http://physics.princeton.edu/strings2014/slides/Strominger.pdf. Question 29. Page 11. Apparently whoever wrote the "Hints" for the many other questions didn't think this needed expansion (or that a hint would have to be too expansive). Page 5 tells us what Strominger asked to evoke his list of 74 questions "that we can concretely address and plausibly hope to answer in the next 5-10 years".

Sorry, this is mistakenly posted as an Answer. I had intended it to be a comment.

@PeterMorgan Ok I have converted it into a comment for now, but I think it's OK as an answer too, though not a direct one...

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$Overflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...