# Is $\overline{\psi_{L}^{c}}\psi_{R}^{c}=\overline{\psi_{R}}\psi_{L}$ true for two different spin 1/2 fermions?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
258 views

In the context of seesaw mechanism or Dirac and Majorana mass terms, one often see the following identity $$\overline{\psi_{L}^{c}}\psi_{R}^{c}=\overline{\psi_{R}}\psi_{L}.$$

Here, I am using 4 components notation in the chiral basis. The convention for the charge conjugation is $\psi^{c}=-i\gamma^{2}\psi^{*}$, and $\psi_{L}^{c}=\left(\psi_{L}\right)^{c}$. The following is my effort of proving it. $$\overline{\psi_{L}^{c}}\psi_{R}^{c}=\overline{i\gamma^{2}\psi_{L}^{*}}i\gamma^{2}\psi_{R}^{*}=\left(i\gamma^{2}\psi_{L}^{*}\right)^{+}\gamma^{0}i\gamma^{2}\psi_{R}^{*}=\psi_{L}^{T}i\gamma^{2}\gamma^{0}i\gamma^{2}\psi_{R}^{*}$$ $$=-\psi_{L}^{T}\gamma^{2}\gamma^{0}\gamma^{2}\psi_{R}^{*}=\psi_{L}^{T}\gamma^{2}\gamma^{2}\gamma^{0}\psi_{R}^{*}=-\psi_{L}^{T}\gamma^{0}\psi_{R}^{*}=-\psi_{L,i}\gamma_{ij}^{0}\psi_{R,j}^{*}.$$ Now if $\psi_{L,i}$ and $\psi_{R,i}$ are anticommuting, then one have $$-\psi_{L,i}\gamma_{ij}^{0}\psi_{R,j}^{*}=\psi_{R,j}^{*}\gamma_{ji}^{0}\psi_{L,i}=\overline{\psi_{R}}\psi_{L}.$$ Question:

Is the anticommuting assumption still true if $\psi_{R}$ and $\psi_{L}$ are two different species of fermion? (For example, $\psi_{L}=\chi_{L}$)

Do we assume any two fermions are anticommuting even if they are two different fields in QFT?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-05-04 11:37 (UCT), posted by SE-user Louis Yang
What do you mean by $\psi_L=\chi_L$? Two different fermionic fields always commute. Here, $\psi_R$ and $\psi_L$ are just different projections of the same field.
By $\psi_{L}=\chi_{L}$, I mean to replace all the $\psi_{L}$ by $\chi_{L}$ in the above derivation. So now $\chi_{L}$ and $\psi_{R}$ are two different Weyl spinors. They are not just the projection of a single Dirac fermion. I guess your answer is that if $\chi_{L}$ and $\psi_{R}$ are two different fields, then they commute. So we will have $\overline{\chi_{L}^{c}}\psi_{R}^{c}=-\overline{\psi_{R}}\chi_{L}$ instead of $\overline{\chi_{L}^{c}}\psi_{R}^{c}=\overline{\psi_{R}}\chi_{L}$.
 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.