• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,075 questions , 2,226 unanswered
5,348 answers , 22,757 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Pedagogical explanations of critical dimensions of string theories

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

Once you understand the formalism, I think it's clearest to say the critical dimension of the space-time arises because we need to cancel the central charge of the (super)conformal ghosts on the worldsheet.

But suppose I need to explain this to a person who only knows very basic QFT. How would you explain the concept of the critical dimension?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-26 12:54 (UCT), posted by SE-user Yuji
asked Feb 11, 2011 in Theoretical Physics by Yuji (1,395 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

There are about 10 "significantly different" ways of calculating the critical dimension but all of them require some maths. n For the case of bosonic string theory, one may show that the $bc$ system carries the central charge $-3k^2+1$ for $k=3$ which is $-26$, so it has to be canceled by 26 bosons.

Alternatively, one may define the light-cone gauge string. Only $D-2$ transverse dimensions produce oscillators. There are oscillators $$\alpha_n^i$$ where $i$ has $D-2$ different values and $n$ is an integer. The squared mass (in spacetime) of the string i.e. particle is given by the total excitation of all the harmonic oscillators $$\sum_{n>0,i} \alpha_{-n}^i \alpha^i_n$$ The oscillators $\alpha_n$ are normalized as $\sqrt{n}\hat a$ for a normal annihilation operator of the harmonic oscillator, so the excitations are weighed by $n$. Consequently, the zero-point energy is $$\frac{D-2}{2}\sum_{n=1}^\infty n$$ The sum of positive integers is equal to $-1/12$ - by the zeta-function regularization or any equally good one (the correct final result of the sum has been known for a century or more). The first excited state - excited by $\alpha_{-1}^i$ - adds one to the energy and it is a spacetime vector. However, it only has $D-2$ components rather than $D-1$ components, so it must correspond to a massless particle. Consequently, $$\frac{D-2}{2} \left(-\frac{1}{12}\right)+1 = 0$$ has to hold. It follows that $D-2=24$, $D=26$.

The calculations of the superstring critical dimension, $D=10$, have to account for the world sheet fermions as well (which can be added via several equivalent machineries, either as spacetime vectors, RNS, or spacetime spinors, GS). Alternatively, one may adopt a spacetime perspective and explain why 10 and 11 are the right dimensions in which maximally supersymmetric string theory and M-theory may live.

In some sense, a basic knowledge of QFT is enough to understand those calculations - but less than the basic knowledge of QFT is just not enough. As far as I know, there is no honest "high school level" derivation of the critical dimension - even though the final result may be understood by the high school kids.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-26 12:54 (UCT), posted by SE-user Luboš Motl
answered Feb 11, 2011 by Luboš Motl (10,278 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks, could you list ten different ways, so that I can learn?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-26 12:54 (UCT), posted by SE-user Yuji
Dear Yuji, sorry, this is too time-consuming because I would probably have to explain the objects. Check Joe Polchinski's textbook that derives the critical dimension in 7 ways - but you won't find a list of the ways, anyway. ;-) This is just not how physics works. There is no precise number "10" for the number of ways, and there's no precise way to say whether two methods are really "the same" or not. I listed two ways to get $D=26$ in the comment above; the historically first appearance of $D=26$ was actually in a more complex context - in the unitarity of loop amplitudes.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-26 12:54 (UCT), posted by SE-user Luboš Motl
OK, I guess I need to go back to Polchinski's bible... thanks anyways

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-26 12:54 (UCT), posted by SE-user Yuji

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights