Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

122 submissions , 103 unreviewed
3,497 questions , 1,172 unanswered
4,548 answers , 19,352 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
409 active unimported users
More ...

Reference needed for Iron-based superconductors

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
19 views

Iron-based superconductor is a class of high-$T_c$ superconductors discovered in 2008.

Are there any review papers about these superconductors yet? If not, which are the key papers in the field?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 05:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user leongz
asked May 14, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by leongz (50 points) [ no revision ]

2 Answers

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Well, Let Me Google That For You

For specific recommendations, the review in Nature by Paglione and Greene is very highly cited and accessible. There is a review of the magnetic properties by Lumsden and Christianson and a somewhat older article is available from Hosono and collaborators. A Nature review on the debate over the pairing mechanism is available from Mazin

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 05:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user Jen
answered May 15, 2012 by Jen (80 points) [ no revision ]
+1 for LMGTFY.$\,$

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 05:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user Warrick
+ 0 like - 0 dislike

10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1589: A comprehensive review in Dec 2011 by G. R. Stewart containing a myriad of key experimental and theoretical results.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 05:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user leongz
answered May 24, 2012 by leongz (50 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsO$\varnothing$erflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...