• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,600 questions , 1,219 unanswered
4,601 answers , 19,546 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
422 active unimported users
More ...

Time Evolution of a Manifold Embedding

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Given a smooth manifold $\mathcal{M}$ with a simplicial complex embedding $\mathsf{S}$, what specific tools or methods can be used to give an analysis of the time evolution of the manifold given some initial conditions? More specifically, if I have a gauge group $G_{\phi}$ acting on the simplicial complex with subgroups $S, SO(3), T$ representing scaling, rotation, and translation on the manifold, how can I introduce time into this picture?

This is a general question that has been applied in the context of Causal Dynamical Triangulations, and I am essentially looking for a reference on how to get started reading about this field, and other questions relating manifold triangulations and time evolution.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Mar 29, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by Samuel Reid (80 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Mar 18, 2014 by dimension10

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

I'm a little confused about your question but I will do my best to answer some of the points I understand.

I imagine your primary interest in asking this question (since you mention CDT) is that you would like to learn about using simplicial approaches to study general relativity or quantum gravity. For this the primary tool is the Regge Calculus, my favorite reference for this is Rafael Sorkins PhD thesis: http://thesis.library.caltech.edu/2978/.

This incidentally also deals with how to study electromagnetism and so in a sense corresponds to to your questions about gauge groups. Remember though that a gauge group usually acts on an internal space, and so a simplicial complex is not enough to study gauge theories you also need to look into how you define fields (vector, spinor) on these geometrical objects. This can be tricky for the spinors.

To study explicitly the question of time evolution of a simplicial complex (via the Regge equations) the best reference I know is: http://www.springerlink.com/content/833k12q7110w7623/.

Finally you should realize that CDT does not have a time evolution in this sense. Although "time" enters as a criteria for which combinations of simplices appear in the sum over paths there is no classical time evolution as it is meant to be a quantum theory. That said in two dimensions you can find a Hamiltonian operator which evolves "loop states" via a Schrodinger type equation. Good CDT references are:



There are loads of references for this stuff so just look around, but these should start you on your way.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Mar 29, 2012 by Kyle (335 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks for the references, this is exactly what I was looking for. Maybe the next time I ask a question about this stuff, it will not be misusing terminology!

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I just about cried when I saw the thesis you linked to Regge Calculus wasn't typed in LaTeX.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
its from a different era, but still the best reference on Regge calculus in my opinion.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights