Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,549 answers , 19,357 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
410 active unimported users
More ...

Recent news about Tokamak

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
96 views

I first heard about the Tokamak in highschool 10 years ago and was wondering how far the technology has come since then. Can it sustain a reaction for more than a few seconds? Are these devices still huge or have they been made on a smaller scale?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:31 (UCT), posted by SE-user Joe
asked Jul 19, 2011 in Experimental Physics by Joe (40 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Mar 24, 2014 by dimension10
I suppose you've already checked the wikipedia list?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:31 (UCT), posted by SE-user Marek
@Marek: Yes, I was looking for more of an intuitive idea of how successful these devices are.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:31 (UCT), posted by SE-user Joe
more seriously, ITER should be operative by 2018, but there is skepticism that you can reach breakeven, that is, that it will be able to produce more energy than it consumes, with tokamak technology

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:31 (UCT), posted by SE-user lurscher

1 Answer

+ 7 like - 0 dislike

Can it sustain a reaction for more than a few seconds?

Yes, at JET. Lifetime of the plasma: 20–60 s

At ITER: It will operate over a wide range of ITER plasma scenarios, from short plasma pulses (a few hundred seconds) with enlarged fusion power (700 MW) to long plasma pulses of 3,000 s

Are these devices still huge or have they been made on a smaller scale?

They have to be large in order to give out more energy than they consume. This is the ITER link, the one planned and already being built, to get the size idea.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:31 (UCT), posted by SE-user anna v
answered Jul 19, 2011 by anna v (1,710 points) [ no revision ]

As of today (Jan.2016), go to http://www.iter.org/faq and select the category 'fusion as a sustainable energy source'.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$Overflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...