Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,552 answers , 19,366 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

How can scintillation gamma-spectrometers work given that track length is different for different angles?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
154 views

As far as I understand, the basic principle of gamma spectrometer is simple - gamma ray hits scintillator, it generates number of photons which roughly proportional to gamma ray energy. Then we need to detect these secondary photons and plot a nice graph.

But as far as I see, scintillator size is typically too small to completely absorb gamma photon. Which also means that gamma photons coming from different angles will have different track lengths inside scintillator - and should generate different amount of light for the same gamma ray energy.

So, how can this work at all?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user BarsMonster
asked Nov 1, 2013 in Experimental Physics by BarsMonster (45 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Mar 24, 2014 by dimension10

2 Answers

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

Well, it depends on the detector package, but you have three basic choices:

  • Restricted geometry You rig the detector such that only a very limited range of angles is possible. Generally with collimators and/or very limited interaction regions.

    Cheap and often easy, but almost always means very low acceptance.

  • Segmented detector You divide the active region into a sufficient number of individually instrumented pieces with the geometry arranged (crossing strips...) so that you can reconstruct the track by looking at what detector elements were hit, and that way you know the track length.

    Costs more because of all the instrumentation and you have to gain match all the segments; program the reconstruction; and deal with the ambiguity that can be caused by simultaneous hits.

    This is the workhorse of this business.

  • Calorimetry Make the detector deep enough to fully absorb the incident photons.

    You generally use leaded glass or other high-density scintillator for this.

As a practical matter we almost always use a combination of the above. Most detector packages have some collimation, and almost all use segmentation (even the calorimeters).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user dmckee
answered Nov 1, 2013 by dmckee (420 points) [ no revision ]
+ 2 like - 0 dislike

A gamma photon does not release its energy travelling into the material but deposes it into a very local spot when it happens to interact by photoelectric, Compton scattering or pair production (other processes are very rare). The electron that emerges from these interactions typically travels few millimeters inside the material releasing all its energy (and a correlated amount of optical photons) into a single crystal.

The nasty interaction here is the Compton scattering in which also a secondary photon (of quite random energy) comes out. It may interact again into the same crystal but often it escapes taking some of the energy away.

To solve this problem you need the concept of coincidence. If you detect interactions in different crystals in a very narrow time windows you can assume that these comes from the same initial photon and rarely you will be wrong. So looking at coincidences you can reconstruct the energy of the initial gamma by summing all the energy deposed in the crystals. Or also you may go for an anti-Compton shielding which consist of a very heavy material (with high cross section) which surrounds the detector and allow to discard events in which a Compton scattered photon tried to leave the crystal but was stopped by the shielding.

Finally what matters is simply building up some statistics to get an energy spectrum in which every kind of event which is likely to happen will be signed by a nice peak while the unlucky "bad" events when some energy has escaped just fill up some noise background.

What said before is generally valid for gammas coming from nuclear decays/excitation whose energies are around the MeV. If we are talking about energy of GeV like the gammas generated by cosmic rays or by high-energy particle accelerators then the things are pretty different. After the first interaction the products will have enough energy to interact again and again creating a so called electromagnetic shower. You will need a pretty big and heavy (array of) crystal (=calorimeter) to contain all this cascade.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user DarioP
answered Nov 1, 2013 by DarioP (20 points) [ no revision ]
+1 - the attenuation length may be long, but attenuation of individual photons happens in discrete steps

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user Chris White
I see, but why then segmented detectors needed, like it was mentioned in the previous answer by dmckee? To also track results of Compton scattering to lower noise floor?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user BarsMonster
@BarsMonster A segmented detector like the AGATA Germanium array enables you to do gamma-ray tracking. Detecting multiple Compton interactions with high resolution in both energy (coming from the material) and position (coming from segmentation), you can reconstruct also the initial directions of the gammas. This also opens up a lot of possibilities in creating images with many medical and industrial applications. Still a lot of interesting investigation on nuclear structure has been done with bulky non-segmented detector in the last decades often with help of anti-Compton screening.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:18 (UCT), posted by SE-user DarioP

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysi$\varnothing$sOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...