Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,549 answers , 19,356 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
410 active unimported users
More ...

Dark matter detection

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
744 views

In the detection of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs), which is the basis of dark matter, what is the use of the tank filled with liquid xenon? I mean, how does the releasing of photons contribute in the detection of WIMPs?
To relate to what I'm talking about, you can follow this link:
http://www.universetoday.com/105943/new-dark-matter-detector-draws-a-blank-in-first-test-round/

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:16 (UCT), posted by SE-user Shaona Bose
asked Nov 3, 2013 in Experimental Physics by Shaona Bose (10 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Mar 24, 2014 by dimension10
Note that WIMPs are only one of several candidates for dark matter, and xenon TPC is only one of several proposed methods for detecting them.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:16 (UCT), posted by SE-user dmckee

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

LUX is a "time projection chamber".

That means it is a big volume of material (in this case cryogenic xenon) and subjected to a strong electric field. The field causes ionization electrons to drift to two or more non-colinear planes of detection wires. The front wires must be so-call "induction" wires that do not absorb the ionization electrons.

This means that you can get information about the drift electron's positions in at least two different direction and reconstruct their position in two dimension.

But it gets better: with a uniform field the drift velocity is very reliable, so if you know when the electrons started drifting and when they were detected you also know how far they drifted and thus have reconstructed their starting position in 3D.

Heavy noble gasses make a really good medium for such devices because

  • If sufficiently pure loose ionization electrons can go uncaptured for many miliseconds allowing very long drift distances (meters).

  • These materials scintillate (that is release light) when ionizing radiation passes through them. That light is detected within nanoseconds of it's release and used to tag the drift start time. The electron detection electronics, of course, tag the detection time.

LUX is searching for ionizing events in the detector that

  1. Can not be explained by the (many) known kinds of physics that generate signals in these detectors

  2. Have the characteristics that are expected of WIMP--ordinary matter interactions (which can be conjectured with some accuracy because we define a WIMP as having certain properties; basically there can only be elastic $Z^0$ at the WIMP vertex which generates a modest number of final states).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:16 (UCT), posted by SE-user dmckee
answered Nov 3, 2013 by dmckee (420 points) [ no revision ]
Aside: I spent last summer helping to build a large microBooNE (a large liquid argon TPC for neutrino detection), so I have some sense of the difficulty of the project. Though LUX has much higher radio-purity requirements than microBooNE.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 04:16 (UCT), posted by SE-user dmckee

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$Overflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...