Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

Please welcome our new moderators!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

122 submissions , 103 unreviewed
3,497 questions , 1,172 unanswered
4,544 answers , 19,342 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
408 active unimported users
More ...

Entanglement in time

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
28 views

Quantum entanglement links particles through time, according to this study that received some publicity last year:

I have read all the reviews in the popular press, most of the "time-travel-discovered" type, but I am looking for more sober comments, written by physicists who have studied the paper. What does this result really mean? I would appreciate pointers to reviews, comments etc. This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Mar 11, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by Giulio Prisco (120 points) [ no revision ]
Piotr - yes, by "this result" I mean the general concept of timeline entanglement (particles at different times can be entangled just like particles at different locations at a given time), and the specific conclusion of Olson and Ralph:"timelike entanglement may be regarded as a non-classical resource in a manner analogous to the spacelike entanglement that is often studied in the Minkowski vacuum, since any quantum information theoretic protocol may utilize conversion of timelike entanglement to spacelike entanglement as a step in the protocol."

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
What does "this result" in _What does this result really mean?_ mean? Do you mean the concept of "timelike entanglement" or sth else?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

1 Answer

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

I would venture that the paper is less significant than it seems, since in a universe with special relativity, what looks like a successful experimental proof of spatial entanglement to one observer will always look like a mix of space and time entanglement to another one.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Mar 13, 2012 by Terry Bollinger (100 points) [ no revision ]
Giulio: I need a diagram for this, but here goes: An entangled event has two classical terminators that within a single light cone that radiates from the point of entanglement. Both origin-to-terminator paths must remain causally isolated from the rest of the universe. One short path and one long path gives time-like separation; same-length paths gives space-like separation. _Neither case differs_ when defining the consistency relationship between the terminus points. However, to classical observers the cases are different, with time-like akin to capturing half a Stern-Gerlach population.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
[on the road] Well stated Giulio; nice clean fallacy capture, and mea culpa for creating the fallacy. I'll try again when I get a moment. SR should still have geometric implications even for this spacelike separation, but not the way I just said. (Anyone?)

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Thanks Terry. If "a successful experimental proof of spatial entanglement" is defined as experimental confirmation of entanglement between two particles out of each other's light cone (in other words, if there is not enough time for the particles to have exchanged signals at the speed of light), which is an invariant, then a successful experimental proof of spatial entanglement will look the same to all observers.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysi$\varnothing$sOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...