Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

122 submissions , 103 unreviewed
3,497 questions , 1,172 unanswered
4,548 answers , 19,352 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
409 active unimported users
More ...

Constructing the space of quantum states

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
19 views

I want to learn how to construct spaces of quantum states of systems.

As an exercize, I tried to build the space of states and to find hamiltonian spectrum of the quantum system whose Hamiltonian is the Hamiltonian of the harmonic oscillator with the quadratic term: $\hat{H}=\hat{H}_{0}+\hat{H}_{1}$, where

$\hat{H}_{0}=\hbar\omega\left(\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}+1/2\right)$, $\hat{H}_{1}=\dot{\imath}\gamma\left(\hat{a}^{\dagger}\right)^{2}-\dot{\imath}\gamma\left(\hat{a}\right)^{2}$; $\hat{a}$, $\hat{a}^{\dagger}$-ladder operators, $\gamma$-real parameter

For this purpose, we should define a complete set of commuting observables (CSCO).

As for the harmonic oscillator, we can define a "number" operator $N=\hat{a}^{\dagger}\hat{a}$.

We can prove the following statement:

Let be $a$ and $a^{\dagger}$ Hermitian conjugated operators and $\left[a,a^{\dagger}\right]=1$. Define operator $N=aa^{\dagger}$. Then we can prove that $\left[N,a^{p}\right]=-pa^{p}, \left[N,a^{\dagger p}\right]=pa^{\dagger p}$ and that the only algebraic functions of $a$ and $a^{\dagger}$, which commute with $N$, are the functions of $N$. (For example, see Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, exercises after chapter $12$)

Using this statement, we conclude(am i right?) that operator $N$ forms a CSCO. So, sequence of eigenvectors of operator $N$ forms the basis of the space of states. So, I've come to the conclusion that the space of states of the described system is the same as the space of states of harmonic oscillator.

But operators $a$, $a^{\dagger}$ can always be determined (as i think), so this arguments will be valid, so I've come to the conclusion, that spaces of states of all systems will be the same. After that I realized that I am mistaken.

Would you be so kind to explain where is a mistake in the arguments above? And can you give some references/articles/books where i can read some additional information about constructing spaces of states for different systems?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 17:24 (UCT), posted by SE-user xxxxx
asked Dec 15, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by xxxxx (100 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

All infinite dimensional Hilbert spaces which have orthonormal bases which are countable are indeed isomorphic. (Obviously finite dimensional ones aren't!).

When people talk about "constructing spaces of states", they tend to be talking about constructing explicit representations for the states and operators, rather than constructing the abstract space of states.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 17:24 (UCT), posted by SE-user twistor59
answered Dec 16, 2012 by twistor59 (2,490 points) [ no revision ]
if there is no problems with the fact, that I get a complete set of commuting observables always is formed by only one operator N?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 17:24 (UCT), posted by SE-user xxxxx
I think that both in the "normal" harmonic oscillator case and in your modified harmonic oscillator, the number operator eigenvalues specifies all there is to be known about the state. Once you know how many excitations there are, everything can be derived from that. In more complicated systems, like, for example, the H atom in 3 dimensions, you can't necessarily do it with one observable - e.g. energy isn't enough, you also need to specify total angular momentum and (say) the z component.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 17:24 (UCT), posted by SE-user twistor59

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...