Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

Please welcome our new moderators!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

122 submissions , 103 unreviewed
3,497 questions , 1,172 unanswered
4,544 answers , 19,342 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
408 active unimported users
More ...

Constructing a Hamiltonian (as a polynomial of $q_i$ and $p_i$) from its spectrum

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
363 views

For a countable sequence of positive numbers $S=\{\lambda_i\}_{i\in N}$ is there a construction producing a Hamiltonian with spectrum $S$ (or at least having the same eigenvalues for $i\leq s$ for some $s$)?

Here by 'Hamiltonian' I understand a polynomial of $p_i$ and $q_i$ (or equivalently - $a_i$ and $a_i^\dagger$) of $k$ pairs of variables and of order $2n$. Both $k$ and $n$ can be functions of $S$ and $s$.

For example, for the spectrum $$S =\{3,5,7,9,\ldots\}$$ one of Hamiltonians working for any $s$ is $$H = 3+a^\dagger a.$$

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Feb 17, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by Piotr Migdal (1,250 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Mar 7, 2014 by dimension10
@PiotrMigdal: For a finite spectrum there is no unique solution. I suspect this is also true for the infinite case, but I am not sure.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@DavidBarMoshe Any claims about uniqueness would be desirable. However, I don't suspect that to be the case,

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
THe coefficients are real.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Not sure that it is relevant to your question, but there was a discussion on related topic at physics.stackexchange: http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/13480/in-quantum-mechanics-given-certain-energy-spectrum-can-one-generate-the-corresp . Probably some references from there might be useful for this problem too.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Surely, the solution can be not unique, for example, the adjoint action by a unitary transformation would not change the spectrum. Will you be satisfied with any Hamiltonian having the given spectrum?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Are the coefficients in this polynomial supposed to be real, or integer...? (in the latter case, you only have countably many such polynomials and uncountably many possible spectra) If the coefficients are real, your polynomial would have to somehow encode a subset of $N$ in the coefficients, which might be difficult to do) An interesting question, BTW.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

3 Answers

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

It seems there is a simply way to do this for polynomials with finite degree $d$. Since $a^\dagger a$ is the number operator, we can take $a^\dagger a = N$, where $N$ is the number of excitations corresponding to a particular level. Then if the Hamiltonian has the general form $H = \sum_{k=0}^d c_k (a^\dagger a)^k$, the energy corresponding to a particular state is $E_N = \sum_{k=0}^d c_k N^k$. Since $N$ is constant for a given eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, the equation for $E_N$ is just a linear equation in the variables $\{c_k\}_k$. Since you have the spectrum, you have $E_N$, and hence you can solve using Guassian elimination (or whatever your preferred technique is for solving linear systems of equations). Even if the spectrum is infinite, you will only need $d+1$ equations to fix the values of $c_k$, so this is a simple calculation.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Feb 18, 2012 by Joe Fitzsimons (3,555 points) [ no revision ]
I think, the [Newton interpolation formula](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_difference#Newton.27s_series) may be used instead of Gaussian elimination in this case

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Joe, thanks for your solution; I overcomplicated it by looking at more modes. It is even easier to deal with it for $\sum_k c_k a^{\dagger k} a^k$ as then it can be solved step by step (i.e. adding $n$-th eigenvalue does not modify $c_k$ for $k

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
+ 3 like - 0 dislike

It was already mentioned in a comment above about a topic in physics.SE, that it may be related with inverse scattering problem. I only may add, that there is precise method of construction of Shroedinger operator $p^2 + V(q)$ with arbitrary finite spectrum for one-dimensional case. It is very well developed due to application to soliton theory. The polynomial operators $V(q)$ have some problems due to infinities for $q \to \pm \infty$, but for $V(q)$ with fast convergence to zero there are hundreds papers. Especially simple construction may be found, e.g., in M. Ablowitz, H. Segur, Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Transform, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1981.

The idea, that if you have some $L_1 = p^2 + u(q)$ with given spectrum, there is an elegant method to add yet another eigenvalue $\zeta$. You should consider equation $L_1 g = \zeta g$, find the solution $g(q)$. Then $L_2 = p^2 + u + 2 (\ln (g))''$ saves all eigenvalues of $L_1$, but also has new eigenvalue $\zeta$ with eigenfunction $1/g(q)$. So you may start with $u=0$ and add eigenvalues one after another.

Yet, as I mentioned here is a problem with polynomial case, it is one-dimensional and may be only useful thing is idea to search for trick like $g \to 1/g$ with adding eigenvalues...

[ADD] (1). I think, it is possible also to consider products $L_k(q_k)$, etc. (2). It is not unique, e.g., isospectral deformation of $L$ is described by KdV equation (yet, it was also mentioned in a reference in Physics.SE thread)

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Feb 18, 2012 by Alex V (290 points) [ no revision ]
+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Here's a new paper which may be related this problem, and appeared today on the archive:

Recovering the Hamiltonian from spectral data

Cyrille Heriveaux, Thierry Paul

http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.5102

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Feb 24, 2012 by Cristi Stoica (255 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...