Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,549 answers , 19,357 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
410 active unimported users
More ...

When you apply the spin operator, what exactly is does it tell you?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
603 views

The example I'm trying to understand is:

$ \hat{S}_{x} \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \end{pmatrix} = 1/2 \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \end{pmatrix} $

My interpretation of this is that the vector shows you the probabilities of a particle being spin up or spin down if you square them.

And I've been told that $ \hat{S}_{x} $ gives you the spin as an eigenvalue, but how? Since its 50:50 of getting -1/2 and 1/2. $ \hat{S}_{x} $ has only given you one of them.

Is it that $ \hat{S}_{x} $ only measures the magnitude of spin in the x direction?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 16:56 (UCT), posted by SE-user 9k9
asked Dec 24, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by 9k9 (20 points) [ no revision ]
You operated on an eigenvector of the spin operator. Generally, wave functions will be linear combinations of these eigenvectors, and their coefficients represent how much of each eigenvector is in the total state.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 16:56 (UCT), posted by SE-user santa claus

2 Answers

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

$$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ 1 \end{pmatrix} $$ is the eigenvector of $\hat{S}_x=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_x$ with eigenvalue $+\frac{\hbar}{2}$. $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ -1 \end{pmatrix} $$ is the eigenvector of $\hat{S}_x=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_x$ with eigenvalue $-\frac{\hbar}{2}$.

So for your vector it isn't 50/50 probability of getting + or -, it's 100% probability of getting +.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 16:56 (UCT), posted by SE-user twistor59
answered Dec 24, 2012 by twistor59 (2,490 points) [ no revision ]
But I thought the way in which you arrive at the "vector" is by computing the probabilities for each spin state?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 16:56 (UCT), posted by SE-user 9k9
+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Your equation says that your "vector" is an an eigenvector of your operator, i.e., that the x-projection of the spin is certain an equal to 1/2. As well it says that probabilities to find certain z-projections are equal to 1/2.

This "vector" is not an eigenvector $\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 1 \end{pmatrix}$ or $\begin{pmatrix} 1\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}$ of the spin z-projection $\hat{S}_z=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_z$ , but is a superposition of them, that is why it is an eigenvector of a non-commuting with $\hat S_z$ operator $\hat{S}_x=\frac{\hbar}{2}\sigma_x$ .

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 16:56 (UCT), posted by SE-user Vladimir Kalitvianski
answered Dec 24, 2012 by anonymous [ no revision ]
Thanks, it took me awhile to realize everything is based on the z direction.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 16:56 (UCT), posted by SE-user 9k9

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$w
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...