Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

122 submissions , 103 unreviewed
3,497 questions , 1,172 unanswered
4,548 answers , 19,352 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
409 active unimported users
More ...

Why does the force of gravity get weaker as it travels through the dimensions?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
24 views

Some theories predict that the graviton exists in a dimension that we of course can't see, and that is why the force of gravity is so weak. Because by the time gravity has got from the dimension in which the graviton exists to our dimension it has lost much of its strength.

For a better understanding of this theory, I think this might help:

Bigger:

Why does the force lose strength as is travels through the other dimensions?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 04:26 (UCT), posted by SE-user Olly Price
asked Apr 29, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by Olly Price (30 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Apr 19, 2014 by dimension10
Hi Olly - are you referring to an existing theory of quantum gravity that offers this explanation? If so, it might help to include a link or two so people can read more about it. (Also it's better to start your question with "Some theories predict that..." rather than "I believe that..." so that it's clear you're talking about accepted science, not trying to promote an idea you made up.)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 04:26 (UCT), posted by SE-user David Z
@David Zaslavsky, thanks for the heads up.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 04:26 (UCT), posted by SE-user Olly Price

2 Answers

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

This is nearly a duplicate of large-extra dimensions questions, you can see the answer here. The theories that predict that gravity is weak because it has extra dimensions are the large extra dimensions theories.

The reason gravity gets weaker is that gravity obeys a version of Gauss's law, which states that the outward gravitational field integrated over a large surface is equal to the mass inside (up to pressure corrections--- this is the Newtonian gravity, but the Einstein gravity is qualitatively identical in its scaling).

If you have a sphere of radius R, it's volume goes like $R^d$ by dimensional analysis, where d is the number of dimensions. The surface area goes like $R^{d-1}$ because it's the derivative of the volume with respect to the radius (the surface area is the volume enclosed by two spheres of infinitesimally different radius divided by the infinitesimal radial difference). So the total gravitational field times $R^{d-1}$ is equal to the mass, so that the gravitational field falls off as $R^{d-1}$ where d is the number of spatial dimensions. For 3 dimensions, it falls off as $R^2$, and this is Newton's universal gravitation.

In higher dimensions, gravity falls off faster. So if there are extra dimensions, and only gravity can propagate in these dimensions, gravity gets weaker quickly until you reach the scale where the extra dimensions are curled up. This means that gravity is weaker than other forces to the extent that the extra dimensions are large.

This type of theory must lower the Planck scale tremendously in order for this to be the dominant explanation of gravity's weakness, and in these circumstances, it runs into problems with non-renormalizable corrections, which should have already been observed. This is discussed in the linked answer.

Within standard string theory however, a miniature version of this mechanism allows gravity and the other forces to unify at a slightly lower energy scale than the Planck scale, nearer to the GUT scale, because the size of the extra dimensions is seen to be non zero around there. Lowering the Planck scale by one or two orders of magnitude in this was is not controversial, and was suggested by Witten in the 1980s, long before large extra dimensions were proposed.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 04:26 (UCT), posted by SE-user Ron Maimon
answered Apr 29, 2012 by Ron Maimon (7,295 points) [ no revision ]
+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Why gravity gets weak as it "arrives" at our weak brane can be explained by looking at the warped AdS space given by

$ ds^2 = e^{-2\phi}\eta_{\mu\nu}\, dx^{\mu} dx^{\nu} + d\phi^2$

The flat Minkowski metric $\eta_{\mu\nu}$ is rescaled by the exponential of the 5th dimension $\phi$. Proper distance and time therefore depend on the position in the 5th dimension given by the value of $\phi$. Relating this to the picture in the question, our universe (the weak brane) sits at the maximal value $\phi_{max}$. This means that proper distance and time are short. The Planck brane where gravity is concentrated is found at the minimum value $\phi_{min}$, leading proper distance and time to be huge there.

In summary, most of the volume of the spacetime described by this model is concentrated near the Planck brane. This leads to the effect that the "wave function" of the gravitons (which can escape into the extra dimension) is concentrated near the Planck brane, such that they only weakly overlap and interact with the "wave functions" of the standard model stuff (that is stuck on our weak brane). Gravity is therefore much weaker than the other forces.

I have stolen this again from Lumo ;-P ...; it can be read in more detail in the subsection with the title Randall-Sundrum introduction in this article.

answered Apr 30, 2012 by Dilaton (4,175 points) [ revision history ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...