Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,552 answers , 19,366 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

Do any entanglement measures for mixed states exist that use only single site correlation functions?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
58 views

For a pure state $\rho_{AB}$, the entropy of entanglement of subsystem $A$ is

\begin{equation} S( \rho_A) = -tr (\rho_A \log \rho_A) \end{equation}

where $\rho_A$ is the reduced density matrix of A.

For a single site of a spin chain, $\rho_A$ can be written in terms of single site correlation functions $\langle \sigma_l^\alpha \rangle$ where $\alpha = x,y,z$.

Are there any entanglement measures for mixed states that use only the same correlation functions, $\langle \sigma_l^\alpha \rangle$ where $\alpha = x,y,z$?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Jan 25, 2012 in Theoretical Physics by Calvin (60 points) [ no revision ]
I am not sure what is you question. If you want to express density matrix in the terms of products of Pauli matrices, have a look at http://theoreticalphysics.stackexchange.com/questions/557/hilbert-schmidt-basis-for-many-qubits-reference.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@PiotrMigdal Thanks, but no, that's not what I'm asking. I know that the density matrix can be written in terms of the Pauli matrices. I want to know whether there are any entanglement measures for mixed states which only use the 'single site' correlation functions (i.e. the expectation values of the Pauli matrices). I hope that's clearer.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
I guess one would not call that "correlation functions", so maybe that's what caused the confusion. With this clarification, the answer to your question is no: The maximally entangled and the (unentangled) maximally mixed state have the same reduced single site density matrices (and thus the same expectation values for any local operator), but completely different entanglement.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@NorbertSchuch Slightly off topic, but why wouldn't you call them correlation functions?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@Calvin: Wikipedia says "A correlation function is the correlation between random variables at two different points in space or time".

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

2 Answers

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

It seems that such a measure for mixed states is fundamentally impossible, since you can have both entangled and separable states which have exactly the local expectation values. For pure states, monogamy of entanglement ensures that the impurity of a reduced density matrix (which can be infered from the expectation values of local Pauli operators) is directly related to entanglement. However for mixed states, this is not the case, as the following example will homefully make clear:

Consider a two qubit system, in which the two reduced density matrices are maximally mixed. In this case, it is possible the system is separable, composed of two copies of the maximally mixed state, or it is maximally entangled, composed of a single EPR pair, or anything in between.

Thus no function of local expectation values can distinguish separable from entangled states in general.

However, purity (which is a function of single site correlation functions), can indeed be used as a bound on the entanglement of a system, again due to monogomy of entanglement. If the local system is not maximally mixed, then it is not maximally entangled, and hence maximum amount of entanglement possible for a system is a monotonic function of its (im)purity.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Jan 26, 2012 by Joe Fitzsimons (3,555 points) [ no revision ]
Thank you. Just to check, by local expectation value, you mean one made up of just one Pauli matrix, while something like $\langle \sigma_l^\alpha \sigma_{l+m}^\beta \rangle$ with $\alpha,\beta = x,y,z$ is not.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@Calvin: Exactly, although there is no need to restrict to just Pauli operators.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
As Joe says, the local spectrum will still tell you something about entanglement if you have some kind of promise/information about the global purity. For example, if $S(\rho_{AB})

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Joe: Sorry to reply here, but the website won't let me edit your post (not enough characters); you've made a typo with 'homefully' (hopefully) and also 'monogomy' (monogamy). Please delete this comment, if you can, as it's otherwise useless.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@calvin: As long as the expectation values are all within the same part of the system, they all won't tell you anything about the entanglement (unless you are given additional information).

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
+ 2 like - 0 dislike

For any multipartite state $\rho_{ABC...}$ the product state $\rho_A\otimes\rho_B\otimes\rho_C\otimes\ldots$, with $\rho_A$, $\rho_B$, $\rho_C$, ... the local reduced density matrices of $\rho_{ABC...}$, has exactly the same single-site expectation values. So, with only single-site expectation values one cannot say anything about any kind of correlation, not only about entanglement. On the other hand, thanks to the Schmidt decomposition and the invariance under local unitaries of entanglement measures, it is obvious that all bipartite entanglement measures on pure states can only depend on the spectrum of the reduced density matrix.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Jan 26, 2012 by Marco (260 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ys$\varnothing$csOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...