Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,552 answers , 19,366 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

Reconstruction of information stored in an evaporating black hole from the emission spectrum?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
40 views

For simple setups, where the radiation field deviates not too far from thermodynamic equilibrium (< 10 %), corrections to the Planckian thermal emission spectrum can be calculated (and measured) from the statistical operator method, using the heat flux and the photon flux as additional constraints in the entropy maximazation procedure:

http://einstein.iec.cat/jellebot/documents/articles/PA_99.pdf

Now I am courious if similar considerations could be applied to the situation of an evaporating black hole. Can the information, orignally stored in an evaporating black hole, in principle be reconstracted from analyzing it`s nonequilibrium emission spectrum (obtained from including a sufficient larger number of additional relevant parameters as constraints in the statistical operator method)?

Clarification

I`m pondering if one could describe an evaporating black hole applying nonequilibrium statistical mechanics such that the global mean temperature is not sufficient to describe its thermodynamic state and additional (microscopic) degrees of freedom (which are important to store the information of infalling objects too) must be taken into account. My question then is: Are these deviations from thermodynamic equilibrium translated to deviations of the spectrum of the Hawking radiation from Planck s law? And if so, can this in principle be used to reconstract the information stored in the microscopic degrees of freedom of the black hole?

asked Dec 17, 2011 in Theoretical Physics by Dilaton (4,175 points) [ revision history ]

2 Answers

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

The deviations from thermal equilibrium for a black hole are negligible. The outgoing radiation still encodes the exact state. These are not contradictory statements, because a thermal state has a maximum number of microstates which can produce it, so that the microstate doesn't have to leave a macroscopic imprint.

I heard a classical example of this from Sidney Coleman in the early 1990s. Consider heating a lump of coal at absolute zero with a perfectly coherent laser until it glows red hot, emitting photons until it cools down to absolute zero again. The incoming photons are in a pure state, the outgoing photons are thermal. In principle, all the information about the incoming photons are contained in the outgoing photons, but it can be shown that the reduced density matrix of even 50% of all the photons is essentially perfectly random and thermal. You need to look at nearly all the photons to get the density matrix to reveal the substructure.

Any way of experimentally demonstrating the nonthermalness of a black hole will require an impossible measurment of an observable which combines nearly all the photons. The only reasonable way out is to consider a nearly extremal black hole absorbing a tiny amount of matter, and reemitting it. Within string theory, such a process is not thermal at all but is described (in model black holes) by a brane-matter interaction whose output is reasonably calculable. Gubser and others performed this calculation for D-branes scattering gravitons in string theory in 1995, and this method of coherent model black hole incoming/outgoing scattering was one of the major inputs leading to AdS/CFT.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user Ron Maimon
answered Dec 18, 2011 by Ron Maimon (7,295 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks a log @Ron Maimon, the last (for me a little bit too commpact) paragraph contains a lot of useful information about nonthermal black holes (I was some kind of up to I think). Maybe I`ll come up with follow up comments or questions about it later...

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton
@Ron Maimon Can you point to a reference where I can read Coleman's calculations. It would be very nice to see you posting again.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user Prathyush
@Prathyush: Coleman didn't publish this, he just explained it to me pedagogically. It's a reference to Page's results, which can be read by googling Page time.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user Ron Maimon
+ 0 like - 0 dislike

Take all the outgoing Hawking radiation, evolve it backward in time, then evolve it forward again along an infalling trajectory. Sure, go ahead. Capture all the outgoing Hawking radiation with all the quantum coherence preserved intact including all the relative phases, feed it into a quantum computer which doesn't make a single error and evolve it backward exactly. If you can fight the second law of thermodynamics this way, you can do it.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user Ursecker
answered Dec 18, 2011 by Ursecker (0 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks @Ursecker for this answer, however my question did not aim at evolving things backward against the second law of thermodynamics.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton
@Uresecker: also, extracting the wavefunction of the outgoing photons violates no-cloning. You would need a physical reverser which can coherently reverse the photon's motion.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:34 (UCT), posted by SE-user Ron Maimon

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
$\varnothing\hbar$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...